Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27283
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBebbington, David W-
dc.contributor.authorTucker, Nicholas John Cuthbert-
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-28T10:15:50Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/27283-
dc.description.abstractThis thesis reassesses the evidence surrounding Edward Irving’s controversial teaching about the doctrine of the incarnation. Irving was a controversial figure in his own day and his legacy has been contested ever since he was dismissed from the ministry of the Church of Scotland for teaching that Christ had a ‘fallen’ human nature. This thesis re-examines the emergence and significance of Irving’s teaching. It evaluates the scholarly consensus that his distinctive Christology was a stable feature of his thought and argues the case that his thinking in this area did change significantly. Methodologically, this thesis draws on some aspects of Quentin Skinner’s work in the importance of context (Chapter Two) to understand Irving as he really was, rather than in terms of his later significance. In the light of this, Irving’s biography is examined in Chapter Three, before moving into a discussion of the influential part played by Samuel Taylor Coleridge in Irving’s intellectual development (Chapter Four). The second half of the thesis then moves on to consider the development of Irving’s Christology and the questions surrounding its provenance and development (Chapters Five and Six). Finally, in Chapter Seven, possible sources of explanation for Irving’s distinctive ideas about the Incarnation are exhibited and assessed. The argument of this thesis is that Edward Irving developed an account of the Incarnation that was essentially novel, in response to the Romantic ideas that he had derived from Coleridge. In accordance with Coleridge’s assessment, it is argued that this derivation was rendered more complex by Irving’s incomplete apprehension of Coleridge’s underlying philosophy. Nonetheless, it is argued that Edward Irving’s teaching presented a Romantic version of Christ, and that this distinctive conception owes more to the times in which Irving lived than to the theological tradition to which he claimed adherence.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Stirlingen_GB
dc.subjectChristianityen_GB
dc.subjectScotlanden_GB
dc.subjectNineteenth Centuryen_GB
dc.subjectEdward Irvingen_GB
dc.subjectRomanticismen_GB
dc.subjectColeridgeen_GB
dc.subjectEvangelicalismen_GB
dc.subjectLiberalismen_GB
dc.subjectChalmersen_GB
dc.subjectCarlyleen_GB
dc.subjectSpiriten_GB
dc.subjectRomanticsen_GB
dc.subject.lcshJesus Christ History of doctrines 19th centuryen_GB
dc.subject.lcshTheology, Doctrinal Scotland 19th centuryen_GB
dc.subject.lcshIrving, Edward, 1792-1834en_GB
dc.titleIn search of the romantic Christ: the origins of Edward Irving's theology of incarnationen_GB
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctor of Philosophyen_GB
dc.rights.embargodate2020-04-01-
dc.rights.embargoreasonMy examiners have encouraged me to seek publciation and I would be grateful of the time to revise portions of the thesis as I approach publishers.en_GB
dc.author.emailnick@njctucker.comen_GB
dc.rights.embargoterms2020-04-02en_GB
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2020-04-02-
Appears in Collections:History and Politics eTheses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
In Search of the Romantic Christ.pdf9.36 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.