Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27269
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Tessen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKerry, Sally Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorLimb, Elizabeth Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFurness, Cherylen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWahlich, Charlotteen_UK
dc.contributor.authorVictor, Christina Ren_UK
dc.contributor.authorIliffe, Steveen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWhincup, Peter Hen_UK
dc.contributor.authorUssher, Michaelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorEkelund, Ulfen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFox-Rushby, Juliaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorIbison, Judithen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDeWilde, Stephenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcKay, Cathyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCook, Derek Gen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-24T14:04:55Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-24T14:04:55Z-
dc.date.issued2018-03-09en_UK
dc.identifier.othere1002526en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/27269-
dc.description.abstractBackground Physical inactivity is an important cause of noncommunicable diseases. Interventions can increase short-term physical activity (PA), but health benefits require maintenance. Few interventions have evaluated PA objectively beyond 12 months. We followed up two pedometer interventions with positive 12-month effects to examine objective PA levels at 3–4 years. Methods and findings Long-term follow-up of two completed trials: Pedometer And Consultation Evaluation-UP (PACE-UP) 3-arm (postal, nurse support, control) at 3 years and Pedometer Accelerometer Consultation Evaluation-Lift (PACE-Lift) 2-arm (nurse support, control) at 4 years post-baseline. Randomly selected patients from 10 United Kingdom primary care practices were recruited (PACE-UP: 45–75 years, PACE-Lift: 60–75 years). Intervention arms received 12-week walking programmes (pedometer, handbooks, PA diaries) postally (PACE-UP) or with nurse support (PACE-UP, PACE-Lift). Main outcomes were changes in 7-day accelerometer average daily step counts and weekly time in moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) in ≥10-minute bouts in intervention versus control groups, between baseline and 3 years (PACE-UP) and 4 years (PACE-Lift). PACE-UP 3-year follow-up was 67% (681/1,023) (mean age: 59, 64% female), and PACE-Lift 4-year follow-up was 76% (225/298) (mean age: 67, 53% female). PACE-UP 3-year intervention versus control comparisons were as follows: additional steps/day postal +627 (95% CI: 198–1,056), p = 0.004, nurse +670 (95% CI: 237–1,102), p = 0.002; total weekly MVPA in bouts (minutes/week) postal +28 (95% CI: 7–49), p = 0.009, nurse +24 (95% CI: 3–45), p = 0.03. PACE-Lift 4-year intervention versus control comparisons were: +407 (95% CI: −177–992), p = 0.17 steps/day, and +32 (95% CI: 5–60), p = 0.02 minutes/week MVPA in bouts. Neither trial showed sedentary or wear-time differences. Main study limitation was incomplete follow-up; however, results were robust to missing data sensitivity analyses. Conclusions Intervention participants followed up from both trials demonstrated higher levels of objectively measured PA at 3–4 years than controls, similar to previously reported 12-month trial effects. Pedometer interventions, delivered by post or with nurse support, can help address the public health physical inactivity challenge. Trial registrations PACE-UP isrctn.com ISRCTN98538934; PACE-Lift isrctn.com ISRCTN42122561.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)en_UK
dc.relationHarris T, Kerry SM, Limb ES, Furness C, Wahlich C, Victor CR, Iliffe S, Whincup PH, Ussher M, Ekelund U, Fox-Rushby J, Ibison J, DeWilde S, McKay C & Cook DG (2018) Physical activity levels in adults and older adults 3–4 years after pedometer-based walking interventions: Long-term follow-up of participants from two randomised controlled trials in UK primary care. PLOS Medicine, 15 (3), Art. No.: e1002526. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002526en_UK
dc.rights© 2018 Harris et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.titlePhysical activity levels in adults and older adults 3–4 years after pedometer-based walking interventions: Long-term follow-up of participants from two randomised controlled trials in UK primary careen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pmed.1002526en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid29522529en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePLoS Medicineen_UK
dc.citation.issn1549-1676en_UK
dc.citation.issn1549-1277en_UK
dc.citation.volume15en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderResearch for Patient Benefit Programmeen_UK
dc.contributor.funderHealth Technology Assessment Programmeen_UK
dc.citation.date09/03/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationQueen Mary, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBrunel Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNorwegian School of Sport Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000428983600015en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85045659672en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid906073en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8671-1553en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7181-9107en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0830-7376en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4213-3974en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0995-7955en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4238-4474en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9723-5759en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-02-06en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-02-06en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-05-24en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorHarris, Tess|0000-0002-8671-1553en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKerry, Sally M|0000-0002-7181-9107en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLimb, Elizabeth S|0000-0003-0830-7376en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFurness, Cheryl|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWahlich, Charlotte|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorVictor, Christina R|0000-0002-4213-3974en_UK
local.rioxx.authorIliffe, Steve|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWhincup, Peter H|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorUssher, Michael|0000-0002-0995-7955en_UK
local.rioxx.authorEkelund, Ulf|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFox-Rushby, Julia|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorIbison, Judith|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDeWilde, Stephen|0000-0002-4238-4474en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcKay, Cathy|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCook, Derek G|0000-0002-9723-5759en_UK
local.rioxx.projectPB-PG-0909-20055|Research for Patient Benefit Programme|en_UK
local.rioxx.project10/32/02|Health Technology Assessment Programme|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2018-05-24en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2018-05-24|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamejournal.pmed.1002526.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1549-1277en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
journal.pmed.1002526.pdfFulltext - Published Version2.82 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.