Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27253
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Campaigning for the female vote in the Scottish independence referendum: Comparing women for independence and women together
Author(s): McAngus, Craig
Rummery, Kirstein
Keywords: Social movements
political campaigns
feminism
referendums
Scottish independence
Issue Date: May-2018
Citation: McAngus C & Rummery K (2018) Campaigning for the female vote in the Scottish independence referendum: Comparing women for independence and women together, Scottish Affairs, 27 (2), pp. 145-168.
Abstract: The 2014 Scottish independence referendum campaign saw a surge of campaigning activity from groups on both sides of the debate. The mainstream elements of the campaign were criticised for not bringing enough attention to women's issues, and so Women For Independence (WFI) and Women Together (WT) were created in order to try and alleviate these concerns. This paper aims to compare the two organisations to ascertain whether or not they can be classified as part of wider social movements. Utilising data from the Scottish Political Archive at the University of Stirling, as well as face-to-face interviews and email conversations with activists from both groups, this paper explores the organisational structures and framing strategies of the two groups, as well as the opportunities and constraints they faced when it came to achieving their goals. Whilst WFI can be classified as a Social Movement Organisation operating within both the pro-independence and women's movements, WT cannot be classified in this way and simply existed as a useful campaigning label during the independence referendum. WFI still continues to exist as a healthy, autonomous entity that, should a second independence referendum be called, will be in a strong position to campaign for the female vote and overturn the persistent gender gap that exists in support for Scottish independence.
DOI Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/scot.2018.0234
Rights: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Edinburgh University Press in Scottish Affairs. The Version of Record is available online at: http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/scot.2018.0234.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
McAngus Rummery Final MR.pdf269.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.