|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Discussion of James Pryor's "The merits of incoherence"|
|Citation:||Beck O, Gupta A, Haddock A, Pryor J & Smithies D (2018) Discussion of James Pryor's "The merits of incoherence", Analytic Philosophy, 59 (1), pp. 142-148.|
|Rights:||This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Beck, O. , Gupta, A. , Haddock, A. , Pryor, J. and Smithies, D. (2018), Discussion of James Pryor's “The Merits of Incoherence”. Analytic Philosophy, 59: 142-148, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12117. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.|
|A Dilemma for Dogmatism 011216.pdf||79.31 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.