Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27146
Appears in Collections: | Law and Philosophy Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | Discussion of James Pryor's "The merits of incoherence" |
Author(s): | Beck, Ori Gupta, Anil Haddock, Adrian Pryor, James Smithies, Declan |
Contact Email: | adrian.haddock@stir.ac.uk |
Issue Date: | Mar-2018 |
Citation: | Beck O, Gupta A, Haddock A, Pryor J & Smithies D (2018) Discussion of James Pryor's "The merits of incoherence", Analytic Philosophy, 59 (1), pp. 142-148. |
DOI Link: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phib.12117 |
Rights: | This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Beck, O. , Gupta, A. , Haddock, A. , Pryor, J. and Smithies, D. (2018), Discussion of James Pryor's “The Merits of Incoherence”. Analytic Philosophy, 59: 142-148, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12117. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving. |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
A Dilemma for Dogmatism 011216.pdf | 79.31 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.