Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27146
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Discussion of James Pryor's "The merits of incoherence"
Author(s): Beck, Ori
Gupta, Anil
Haddock, Adrian
Pryor, James
Smithies, Declan
Contact Email: adrian.haddock@stir.ac.uk
Issue Date: Mar-2018
Citation: Beck O, Gupta A, Haddock A, Pryor J & Smithies D (2018) Discussion of James Pryor's "The merits of incoherence", Analytic Philosophy, 59 (1), pp. 142-148.
DOI Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phib.12117
Rights: This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Beck, O. , Gupta, A. , Haddock, A. , Pryor, J. and Smithies, D. (2018), Discussion of James Pryor's “The Merits of Incoherence”. Analytic Philosophy, 59: 142-148, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12117. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
A Dilemma for Dogmatism 011216.pdf79.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.