|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Discussion of James Pryor's "The merits of incoherence"|
|Citation:||Beck O, Gupta A, Haddock A, Pryor J & Smithies D (2018) Discussion of James Pryor's "The merits of incoherence", Analytic Philosophy, 59 (1), pp. 142-148.|
|Rights:||This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Beck, O. , Gupta, A. , Haddock, A. , Pryor, J. and Smithies, D. (2018), Discussion of James Pryor's “The Merits of Incoherence”. Analytic Philosophy, 59: 142-148, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12117. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.|
|A Dilemma for Dogmatism 011216.pdf||79.31 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.