Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27052
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRogers, Annabelleen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Tessen_UK
dc.contributor.authorVictor, Christina Ren_UK
dc.contributor.authorWoodcock, Alisonen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLimb, Elizabeth Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKerry, Sally Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorIliffe, Steveen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWhincup, Peter Hen_UK
dc.contributor.authorEkelund, Ulfen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBeighton, Caroleen_UK
dc.contributor.authorUssher, Michaelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAdams, Fredrikaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCook, Derek Gen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-17T01:49:09Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-17T01:49:09Z-
dc.date.issued2014-04-12en_UK
dc.identifier.other46en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/27052-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Physical activity is of vital importance to older peoples' health. Physical activity intervention studies with older people often have low recruitment, yet little is known about non-participants.  Methods: Patients aged 60-74 years from three UK general practices were invited to participate in a nurse-supported pedometer-based walking intervention. Demographic characteristics of 298 participants and 690 non-participants were compared. Health status and physical activity of 298 participants and 183 non-participants who completed a survey were compared using age, sex adjusted odds ratios (OR) (95% confidence intervals). 15 non-participants were interviewed to explore perceived barriers to participation.  Results: Recruitment was 30% (298/988). Participants were more likely than non-participants to be female (54% v 47%; p = 0.04) and to live in affluent postcodes (73% v 62% in top quintile; p < 0.001). Participants were more likely than non-participants who completed the survey to have an occupational pension OR 2.06 (1.35-3.13), a limiting longstanding illness OR 1.72 (1.05-2.79) and less likely to report being active OR 0.55 (0.33-0.93) or walking fast OR 0.56 (0.37-0.84). Interviewees supported general practice-based physical activity studies, particularly walking, but barriers to participation included: already sufficiently active, reluctance to walk alone or at night, physical symptoms, depression, time constraints, trial equipment and duration.  Conclusion: Gender and deprivation differences suggest some selection bias. However, trial participants reported more health problems and lower activity than non-participants who completed the survey, suggesting appropriate trial selection in a general practice population. Non-participant interviewees indicated that shorter interventions, addressing physical symptoms and promoting confidence in pursuing physical activity, might increase trial recruitment and uptake of practice-based physical activity endeavours.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_UK
dc.relationRogers A, Harris T, Victor CR, Woodcock A, Limb ES, Kerry SM, Iliffe S, Whincup PH, Ekelund U, Beighton C, Ussher M, Adams F & Cook DG (2014) Which older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why: insights from a mixed methods approach. BMC Geriatrics, 14, Art. No.: 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-46en_UK
dc.rights© Rogers et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectPhysical activityen_UK
dc.subjectnon-participationen_UK
dc.subjectprimary careen_UK
dc.subjectolder peopleen_UK
dc.subjectrecruitmenten_UK
dc.titleWhich older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why: insights from a mixed methods approachen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2318-14-46en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid24725730en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMC Geriatricsen_UK
dc.citation.issn1471-2318en_UK
dc.citation.volume14en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailmichael.ussher@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date12/04/2014en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBrunel Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRoyal Holloway University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationQueen Mary, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Cambridgeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLondon South Bank Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000335556400001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84899475625en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid880483en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0995-7955en_UK
dc.date.accepted2014-03-26en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-03-26en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-03-22en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorRogers, Annabelle|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHarris, Tess|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorVictor, Christina R|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWoodcock, Alison|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLimb, Elizabeth S|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKerry, Sally M|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorIliffe, Steve|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWhincup, Peter H|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorEkelund, Ulf|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBeighton, Carole|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorUssher, Michael|0000-0002-0995-7955en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAdams, Fredrika|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCook, Derek G|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2018-04-16en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2018-04-16|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameRogers et al.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Rogers et al.pdfFulltext - Published Version322.69 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.