Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26921
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGiatras, Nikolettaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWanninkhof, Elisabethen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLeontowitsch, Mirandaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Bethen_UK
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Adrianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCooper, Sueen_UK
dc.contributor.authorUssher, Michaelen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-03T22:55:09Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-03T22:55:09Z-
dc.date.issued2017-01-17en_UK
dc.identifier.other85en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/26921-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The challenges of delivering interventions for pregnant smokers have been poorly documented. Also, the process of promoting a physical activity intervention for pregnant smokers has not been previously recorded. This study describes the experiences of researchers conducting a randomised controlled trial of physical activity as an aid to smoking cessation during pregnancy and explores how the effectiveness of future interventions could be improved.  Methods: Two focus groups, with independent facilitators, were conducted with six researchers who had enrolled pregnant smokers in the LEAP trial, provided the interventions, and administered the research measures. Topics included recruitment, retention and how the physical activity intervention for pregnant smokers was delivered and how it was adapted when necessary to suit the women. The focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and subjected to thematic analysis.  Results: Five themes emerged related to barriers or enablers to intervention delivery: (1) nature of the intervention; (2) personal characteristics of trial participants; (3) practical issues; (4) researchers' engagement with participants; (5) training and support needs. Researchers perceived that participants may have been deterred by the intensive and generic nature of the intervention and the need to simultaneously quit smoking and increase physical activity. Women also appeared hampered by pregnancy ailments, social deprivation, and poor mental health. Researchers observed that their status as health professionals was valued by participants but it was challenging to maintain contact with participants. Training and support needs were identified for dealing with pregnant teenagers, participants' friends and family, and post-natal return to smoking.  Conclusions: Future exercise interventions for smoking cessation in pregnancy may benefit by increased tailoring of the intervention to the characteristics of the women, including their psychological profile, socio-economic background, pregnancy ailments and exercise preferences. Delivering an effective physical activity intervention for smoking cessation in pregnancy may require more comprehensive training for those delivering the intervention, particularly with regard to dealing with teenage smokers and smokers' friends and family, as well as for avoiding post-natal return to smoking.  Trial registration: ISRCTN48600346, date of registration: 21/07/2008en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_UK
dc.relationGiatras N, Wanninkhof E, Leontowitsch M, Lewis B, Taylor A, Cooper S & Ussher M (2017) Lessons learned from the London Exercise and Pregnant (LEAP) Smokers randomised controlled trial process evaluation: Implications for the design of physical activity for smoking cessation interventions during pregnancy. BMC Public Health, 17 (1), Art. No.: 85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4013-5en_UK
dc.rights© The Author(s). 2017 This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectProcess evaluationen_UK
dc.subjectresearchers' perspectiveen_UK
dc.subjectsmoking cessationen_UK
dc.subjectphysical activity interventionen_UK
dc.subjectexerciseen_UK
dc.subjectpregnant smokersen_UK
dc.subjectqualitativeen_UK
dc.titleLessons learned from the London Exercise and Pregnant (LEAP) Smokers randomised controlled trial process evaluation: Implications for the design of physical activity for smoking cessation interventions during pregnancyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12889-017-4013-5en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid28095827en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMC Public Healthen_UK
dc.citation.issn1471-2458en_UK
dc.citation.volume17en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.citation.date17/01/2017en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCity University Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGoethe University Frankfurten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Minnesotaen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPlymouth University Peninsula School of Medicine and Dentistryen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000392879100004en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85011890586en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid500075en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0995-7955en_UK
dc.date.accepted2017-01-02en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-01-02en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-03-23en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorGiatras, Nikoletta|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWanninkhof, Elisabeth|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLeontowitsch, Miranda|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLewis, Beth|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTaylor, Adrian|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCooper, Sue|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorUssher, Michael|0000-0002-0995-7955en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2018-03-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2018-03-29|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameGiatras et al.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Giatras et al.pdfFulltext - Published Version451.9 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.