Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26718
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Sheaff, Rod | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Sherriff, Ian | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Hennessy, Catherine | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-10T00:09:52Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-03-10T00:09:52Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-02-05 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.other | 83 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26718 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background Access times for, the costs and overload of hospital services are an increasingly salient issue for healthcare managers in many countries. Rising demand for hospital care has been attributed partly to unplanned admissions for older people, and among these partly to the increasing prevalence of dementia. The paper makes a preliminary evaluation of the logic model of a Dementia Learning Community (DLC) intended to reduce unplanned hospital admissions from care homes of people with dementia. A dementia champion in each DLC care home trained other staff in dementia awareness and change management with the aims of changing work routines, improving quality of life, and reducing demands on external services. Methods Controlled mixed methods realistic evaluation comparing 13 intervention homes with 10 controls in England during 2013–15. Each link in the assumed logic model was tested to find whether that link appeared to exist in the DLC sites, and if so whether its effects appeared greater there than in control sites, in terms of selected indicators of quality of life (DCM Well/Ill-Being, QUALID, end-of-life planning); and impacts on ambulance call-outs and hospital admissions. Results The training was implemented as planned, and triggered cycles of Plan-Do-Study-Act activity in all the intervention care homes. Residents’ well-being scores, measured by dementia care mapping, improved markedly in half of the intervention homes but not in the other half, where indeed some scores deteriorated markedly. Most other care quality indicators studied did not significantly improve during the study period. Neither did ambulance call-out or emergency hospital admission rates. Conclusions PDSA cycles appeared to be the more ‘active ingredient’ in this intervention. The reasons why they impacted on well-being in half of the intervention sites, and not the others, require further research. A larger, longer study would be necessary to measure definitively any impacts on unplanned hospital admissions. Our evidence suggested revising the DLC logic model to include care planning and staff familiarisation with residents’ personal histories and needs as steps towards improving residents’ quality of life. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central | en_UK |
dc.relation | Sheaff R, Sherriff I & Hennessy C (2018) Evaluating a dementia learning community: exploratory study and research implications. BMC Health Services Research, 18 (1), Art. No.: 83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2894-3 | en_UK |
dc.rights | © The Author(s). 2018 This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_UK |
dc.subject | Dementia | en_UK |
dc.subject | Dementia Learning Community | en_UK |
dc.subject | Logic model | en_UK |
dc.subject | Plan-Do-Study-Act | en_UK |
dc.subject | Unplanned admissions | en_UK |
dc.subject | Residential care | en_UK |
dc.subject | England | en_UK |
dc.title | Evaluating a dementia learning community: exploratory study and research implications | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12913-018-2894-3 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 29402291 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | BMC Health Services Research | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1472-6963 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 18 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issue | 1 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | VoR - Version of Record | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 05/02/2018 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Plymouth | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Plymouth | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Faculty of Social Sciences | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000424121600003 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85041413961 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 498114 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-8905-1343 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-01-25 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2018-01-25 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2018-02-15 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | not required | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Sheaff, Rod| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Sherriff, Ian| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Hennessy, Catherine|0000-0002-8905-1343 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Internal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2018-02-15 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2018-02-15| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | s12913-018-2894-3.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
s12913-018-2894-3.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 650.05 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.