Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26712
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | Maltese translation and adaptation of champion's health belief model scale and the revised illness perception questionnaire for breast screening among maltese women |
Author(s): | Marmara, Danika Marmara, Vincent Hubbard, Gill |
Contact Email: | d.m.attard@stir.ac.uk |
Keywords: | Breast cancer screening Champion's Health Belief Model Scale Reliability The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire Validity |
Issue Date: | 2017 |
Date Deposited: | 13-Feb-2018 |
Citation: | Marmara D, Marmara V & Hubbard G (2017) Maltese translation and adaptation of champion's health belief model scale and the revised illness perception questionnaire for breast screening among maltese women. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 25 (3), pp. 486-503. https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.25.3.486 |
Abstract: | Background and Purpose: Translating, adapting, and piloting Champion's Health Belief Model Scale for Mammography Screening (CHBMS-MS) and Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) among Maltese women. Methods: The Maltese questionnaire (Maltese Breast Screening Questionnaire [MBSQ]) was developed through 9 steps. Bilingual women (n = 15) completed MBSQ at 2 time points. Results: During forwardbackward translations (Steps 1-4), 4 English controversial terms were raised. Twelve experts agreed on terminologies during adaptation process (Step 5). Following face validity (n = 6; Step 6), 3 items were deleted. Following reconciliation (Step 7) and proofreading (Step 8), MBSQ consisted of 121 items. Pilot testing (Step 9) showed positive correlation (CHBMS-MS = .87, IPQ-R 5 .85; p < .001); high Cronbach's alpha (CHBMS-MS 5 .93, IPQ-R = .92); overall acceptable internal consistency (CHBMS-MS = .69-.83, IPQ-R = .75-.93); and acceptable test-retest reliability correlations: CHBMS-MS (Maltese = .62-.76; English = .61-.84), IPQ-R (Maltese = .63-.82; English = .61-.91; p < .001). Conclusions: Maltese and English scale items demonstrated high reliability and validity preliminary values. |
DOI Link: | 10.1891/1061-3749.25.3.486 |
Rights: | The publisher has granted permission for use of this work in this Repository. Published in Journal of Nursing Measurement, 2017, 25(3), pp. 486-503 by Springer Publishing: https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.25.3.486 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Figure 1.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 272.32 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Table 3.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 254.33 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Table 2.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 253.76 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Table 1.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 254.75 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
FINAL revised Manuscript.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 399.17 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.