Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Literature and Languages Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: DIY Peer Review and Monograph Publishing in the Arts and Humanities
Author(s): Butchard, Dorothy
Rowberry, Simon
Squires, Claire
Contact Email:
Keywords: Peer review
scholarly publishing
Issue Date: 3-Aug-2018
Date Deposited: 16-Jan-2018
Citation: Butchard D, Rowberry S & Squires C (2018) DIY Peer Review and Monograph Publishing in the Arts and Humanities. Convergence, 24 (5), pp. 477-493.
Abstract: In order to explore monograph peer review in the Arts and Humanities, this article introduces and discusses an applied example, examining the route to publication of Danielle Fuller and DeNel Rehberg Sedo's Reading Beyond the Book: The Social Practices of Contemporary Literary Culture (2013). The book's co-authors supplemented the traditional "blind" peer review system with a range of practices including the informal, DIY review of colleagues and "clever friends," as well as using the feedback derived from grant applications, journal articles, and book chapters. The article "explodes" the book into a series of documents and non-linear processes to demonstrate the significance of the various forms of feedback to the development of Fuller and Rehberg Sedo's monograph. The analysis reveals substantial differences between book and article peer review processes, including an emphasis on marketing in review forms and the pressures to publish, that the co-authors navigated through the introduction of "clever friends" to the review processes. These findings, drawing on Science and Technology Studies (STS), demonstrate how such a research methodology can identify how knowledge is constructed in the Arts and Humanities, and potential implications for the valuation of research processes and collaborations.
DOI Link: 10.1177/1354856518780456
Rights: Squires C, Rowberry S & Butchard D, DIY Peer Review and Monograph Publishing in the Arts and Humanities, Convergence Volume: 24 issue: 5, page(s): 477-493. Copyright © Authors 2018. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Figure 2.pngFulltext - Accepted Version65.42 kBimage/pngThumbnail
Figure 1.pngFulltext - Accepted Version16.86 kBimage/pngThumbnail
DIY Peer Review and Monograph Publishing_acceptedversion.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version411.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.