Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26475
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBishop, Dorothy V Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorSnowling, Margaret Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Paul Aen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGreenhalgh, Trishaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcCartney, Elspethen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-09T12:04:14Z-
dc.date.available2018-01-09T12:04:14Z-
dc.date.issued2016-07-08en_UK
dc.identifier.othere0158753en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/26475-
dc.description.abstractDelayed or impaired language development is a common developmental concern, yet there is little agreement about the criteria used to identify and classify language impairments in children. Children's language difficulties are at the interface between education, medicine and the allied professions, who may all adopt different approaches to conceptualising them. Our goal in this study was to use an online Delphi technique to see whether it was possible to achieve consensus among professionals on appropriate criteria for identifying children who might benefit from specialist services. We recruited a panel of 59 experts representing ten disciplines (including education, psychology, speech-language therapy/pathology, paediatrics and child psychiatry) from English-speaking countries (Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, United Kingdom and USA). The starting point for round 1 was a set of 46 statements based on articles and commentaries in a special issue of a journal focusing on this topic. Panel members rated each statement for both relevance and validity on a sevenpoint scale, and added free text comments. These responses were synthesised by the first two authors, who then removed, combined or modified items with a view to improving consensus. The resulting set of statements was returned to the panel for a second evaluation (round 2). Consensus (percentage reporting 'agree' or 'strongly agree') was at least 80 percent for 24 of 27 round 2 statements, though many respondents qualified their response with written comments. These were again synthesised by the first two authors. The resulting consensus statement is reported here, with additional summary of relevant evidence, and a concluding commentary on residual disagreements and gaps in the evidence base. © 2016 Bishop et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_UK
dc.relationBishop DVM, Snowling MJ, Thompson PA, Greenhalgh T & McCartney E (2016) CATALISE: A multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study. Identifying language impairments in children. PLoS ONE, 11 (7), Art. No.: e0158753. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158753en_UK
dc.rights© 2016 Bishop et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.titleCATALISE: A multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study. Identifying language impairments in childrenen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0158753en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid27392128en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePLoS ONEen_UK
dc.citation.issn1932-6203en_UK
dc.citation.volume11en_UK
dc.citation.issue7en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.citation.date08/07/2016en_UK
dc.description.notesMembers of the CATALISE Consortium: Catherine Adams, Lisa Archibald, Gillian Baird, Ann Bauer, Jude Bellair, Christopher Boyle, Elizabeth Brownlie, Glenn Carter, Becky Clark, Judy Clegg, Nancy Cohen, Gina Conti-Ramsden, Julie Dockrell, Janet Dunn, Susan Ebbels, Aoife Gallagher, Simon Gibbs, Mandy Grist, Mary Hartshorne, Alison Hüneke, Marc Joanisse, Sally Kedge, Thomas Klee, Saloni Krishnan, Linda Lascelles, James Law, Laurence Leonard, Stephanie Lynham, Elina Mainela Arnold, Narad Mathura, Cristina McKean, Brigid McNeill, Angela Morgan, CarolAnne Murphy, Courtenay Norbury, Anne O'Hare, Janis Oram Cardy, Ciara O'Toole, Rhea Paul, Suzanne Purdy, Sean Redmond, Sheena Reilly, Laida Restrepo, Mabel Rice, Vicky Slonims, Pamela Snow, Richard Soppitt, Jane Speake, Sarah Spencer, Helen Stringer, Helen Tager-Flusberg, Rosemary Tannock, Cate Taylor, Bruce Tomblin, Joanne Volden, Marleen Westerveld, Andrew Whitehouseen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Oxforden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Oxforden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Oxforden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Oxforden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEducationen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000380005400115en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84978847087en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid519231en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6234-0348en_UK
dc.date.accepted2016-06-21en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-06-21en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-01-08en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBishop, Dorothy V M|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSnowling, Margaret J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorThompson, Paul A|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGreenhalgh, Trisha|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcCartney, Elspeth|0000-0002-6234-0348en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2018-01-08en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2018-01-08|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamejournal.pone.0168066.s002.PDFen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
journal.pone.0168066.s002.PDFFulltext - Published Version1.35 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.