Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26466
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMoodie, Crawforden_UK
dc.contributor.authorAngus, Kathrynen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, Danielleen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCritchlow, Nathanen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-18T06:19:05Z-
dc.date.available2018-01-18T06:19:05Z-
dc.date.issued2018-07-31en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/26466-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction As a result of the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations and Tobacco Products Directive, all packs of cigarettes (factory-made and hand-rolled) in the United Kingdom must be drab brown, display pictorial warnings on the principal display areas, and contain no less than 20 cigarettes or 30 grams of tobacco. The legislation was phased in between May 2016 and May 2017. Our objective was to monitor pack, brand and product changes pre- and post-implementation.  Methods Our surveillance of the cigarette market involved a review of the trade press, a monthly monitor of online supermarkets, and regular visits to stores, from May 2015 to June 2017.  Results Pre-standardised packaging there were changes to the pack graphics (e.g. redesigned packs and limited-editions) and pack structure (e.g. re-sealable inner foil), and the issue of a number of re-usable tins. Post-standardised packaging, changes included newer cigarette pack sizes for some brand variants (e.g. 23 and 24 packs). Changes to the branding pre-standardised packaging included brand extensions, and post-standardised packaging included brand and/or variant name change, often with the inclusion of colour descriptors, and brand migrations. Product changes pre-standardised packaging included the introduction of novel filters (e.g. filters with two flavour-changing capsules, tube filters, firmer filters, and filters with granular additives). There was non-compliance with the legislation, with slim packs, which are not permitted, on sale after standardised packaging was implemented.  Conclusions Our findings highlight the need to monitor developments in markets introducing standardised packaging, and have policy implications for countries considering this measure.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_UK
dc.relationMoodie C, Angus K, Mitchell D & Critchlow N (2018) How tobacco companies in the United Kingdom prepared for, and responded to, standardised packaging of cigarettes and rolling tobacco. Tobacco Control, 27 (e1), pp. e85-e92. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054011en_UK
dc.rightsThis article has been accepted for publication in Tobacco Control following peer review. The definitive copyedited, typeset version, Moodie C, Angus K, Mitchell D, et al, How tobacco companies in the UK prepared for and responded to standardised packaging of cigarettes and rolling tobacco, Tobacco Control, Published Online First: 10 January 2018, is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054011en_UK
dc.subjectPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Healthen_UK
dc.subjectHealth(social science)en_UK
dc.titleHow tobacco companies in the United Kingdom prepared for, and responded to, standardised packaging of cigarettes and rolling tobaccoen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054011en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid29321273en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleTobacco Controlen_UK
dc.citation.issn1468-3318en_UK
dc.citation.issn0964-4563en_UK
dc.citation.volume27en_UK
dc.citation.issuee1en_UK
dc.citation.spagee85en_UK
dc.citation.epagee92en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderCancer Research UKen_UK
dc.author.emailc.s.moodie@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date10/01/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Health - Stirling - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000442438500017en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85049072807en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid507207en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1805-2509en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5351-4422en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9145-8874en_UK
dc.date.accepted2017-12-08en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-12-08en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-01-05en_UK
dc.relation.funderprojectCentre for Tobacco Control Research 2015en_UK
dc.relation.funderrefC8656/A20456en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMoodie, Crawford|0000-0002-1805-2509en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAngus, Kathryn|0000-0002-5351-4422en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMitchell, Danielle|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCritchlow, Nathan|0000-0001-9145-8874en_UK
local.rioxx.projectC8656/A20456|Cancer Research UK|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000289en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2018-01-10en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2018-01-10en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2018-01-10|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameTC response to PP in UK.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1468-3318en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
TC response to PP in UK.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version473.54 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.