Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26460
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJones, Thomas Wen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Andrewen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMacnaughton, Lindsay Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFrench, Duncan Nen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-23T02:39:54Z-
dc.date.available2017-12-23T02:39:54Z-
dc.date.issued2016-12en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/26460-
dc.description.abstractThere is limited published research on strength and conditioning (S&C) practices in elite rugby union (RU). Information regarding testing batteries and programme design would provide valuable information to both applied practitioners and researchers investigating the influence of training interventions or preperformance strategies. The aim of this study was to detail the current practices of S&C coaches and sport scientists working in RU. A questionnaire was developed that comprised 7 sections: personal details, physical testing, strength and power development, concurrent training, flexibility development, unique aspects of the programme, and any further relevant information regarding prescribed training programmes. Forty-three (41 men, 2 women; age: 33.1 ± 5.3 years) of 52 (83%) coaches responded to the questionnaire. The majority of practitioners worked with international level and/or professional RU athletes. All respondents believed strength training benefits RU performance and reported that their athletes regularly performed strength training. The clean and back squat were rated the most important prescribed exercises. Forty-one (95%) respondents reported prescribing plyometric exercises and 38 (88%) indicated that periodization strategies were used. Forty-two (98%) practitioners reported conducting physical testing, with body composition being the most commonly tested phenotype. Thirty-three (77%) practitioners indicated that the potential muted strength development associated with concurrent training was considered when programming and 27 (63%) believed that strength before aerobic training was more favorable for strength development than vice versa. This research represents the only published survey to date of S&C practices in northern and southern hemisphere RU.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherNational Strength and Conditioning Associationen_UK
dc.relationJones TW, Smith A, Macnaughton LS & French DN (2016) Strength and conditioning and concurrent training practices in elite rugby union. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 30 (12), pp. 3354-3366. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000001445en_UK
dc.rightsThis paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. The final article is available at: https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001445 Jones, TW, Smith, A, Macnaughton, LS, and French, DN. Strength and Conditioning and Concurrent Training Practices in Elite Rugby Union. J Strength Cond Res 30(12): 3354–3366, 2016en_UK
dc.subjectcombined exerciseen_UK
dc.subjectinterferenceen_UK
dc.subjectphysical preparationen_UK
dc.subjectprogramme designen_UK
dc.subjectquestionnaireen_UK
dc.titleStrength and conditioning and concurrent training practices in elite rugby unionen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1519/jsc.0000000000001445en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid27870696en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Strength and Conditioning Researchen_UK
dc.citation.issn1533-4287en_UK
dc.citation.issn1064-8011en_UK
dc.citation.volume30en_UK
dc.citation.issue12en_UK
dc.citation.spage3354en_UK
dc.citation.epage3366en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.citation.date01/12/2016en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationASPIRE Academyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNottingham Rugby Cluben_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNorthumbria Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000389246700011en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85020371735en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid538893en_UK
dc.date.accepted2016-12-01en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-12-01en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2017-12-22en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorJones, Thomas W|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSmith, Andrew|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMacnaughton, Lindsay S|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFrench, Duncan N|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2017-12-22en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2017-12-22|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameJones_etal JSCR_2016.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1064-8011en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Jones_etal JSCR_2016.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version767.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.