Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26381
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Book Chapters and Sections
Title: Translation Across Borders: Connecting the academic and policy communities
Author(s): Connelly, Steve
Vanderhoven, Dave
Durose, Catherine
Matthews, Peter
Richardson, Liz
Rutherfoord, Robert
Contact Email: peter.matthews@stir.ac.uk
Editor(s): Facer, K
Pahl, K
Citation: Connelly S, Vanderhoven D, Durose C, Matthews P, Richardson L & Rutherfoord R (2017) Translation Across Borders: Connecting the academic and policy communities. In: Facer K & Pahl K (eds.) Valuing interdisciplinary collaborative research: Beyond impact. Connected Communities. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 173-190. https://policypress.co.uk/valuing-interdisciplinary-collaborative-research; https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t895tj.15
Issue Date: 2017
Date Deposited: 15-Dec-2017
Series/Report no.: Connected Communities
Abstract: In this chapter we look at the legacy of three projects which connected the research and policy communities, through the development of ‘policy briefs’ for the UK Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG). These were to be short and accessible reviews of research – in particular from the arts and humanities - relevant to policy on localism. Starting from an understanding of policy-making as meaning-making, and of translation as situated and purposeful action, we explored through ethnographic and action research how academics and government analysts translate research into ideas useful for policy makers.  We conclude that the legacy of researching for policy can be understood not just in terms of ‘things left behind’ and their direct impact on policy, but also more broadly in terms of the purposes of all those involved being met, and influences on academic and civil service norms and subsequent practice. Co-production is central to leaving such a legacy, in particular to break down mutual misunderstanding across the policy/academia border and to enable research to be used. In contrast interdisciplinarity seems less important, though broadening the disciplinary base of research used by government is certainly valuable. Underpinning everything else, the development of relationships of trust through collaboration and mutual learning is paramount.
Rights: This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Facer K, Pahl K (eds)., Valuing interdisciplinary collaborative research: Beyond impact, Bristol: Policy Press, 2017. The published book is available at: https://policypress.co.uk/valuing-interdisciplinary-collaborative-research
URL: https://policypress.co.uk/valuing-interdisciplinary-collaborative-research
DOI Link: 10.2307/j.ctt1t895tj.15

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Connelly_etal_BookChapter_2017.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version401.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.