Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26231
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNalcakan, Gulbinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSongsorn, Preeyaphornen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFitzpatrick, Benjamin Len_UK
dc.contributor.authorYüzbasioglu, Yasinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBrick, Noelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMetcalfe, Richarden_UK
dc.contributor.authorVollaard, Nielsen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-13T23:05:00Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-13T23:05:00Z-
dc.date.issued2018-04en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/26231-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Recent studies have demonstrated that modifying the ‘classic’ 6x30-s ‘all-out’ sprint interval training (SIT) protocol by incorporating either shorter sprints (6x10-s or 15-s sprints) or fewer sprints (e.g. 2x20-s sprints; reduced-exertion high-intensity interval training (REHIT)) does not attenuate the training-induced improvements in maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max). The aim of the present study was to determine whether reducing the sprint duration in the REHIT protocol from 20 s to 10 s per sprint influences acute affective responses and the change in VO2max following training.  Methods: Thirty-six sedentary or recreationally active participants (17 women; mean±SD age: 22±3 y, BMI: 24.5±4.6 kg·m-2, VO2max: 37±8 mL·kg-1·min-1) were randomised to a group performing a ‘standard’ REHIT protocol involving 2x20-s sprints or a group who performed 2x10-s sprints. VO2max was determined before and after 6 weeks of 3 weekly training sessions. Acute affective responses and perceived exertion were assessed during training.  Results: Greater increases in VIO2max were observed for the group performing 20-s sprints (2.77±0.75 to 3.04±0.75 L·min-1; +10%) compared to the group performing 10-s sprints (2.58±0.57 vs. 2.67±3.04 L·min-1; +4%; group×time interaction effect: p<0.05; d=1.06). Positive affect and the mood state vigour increased post-exercise, while tension, depression and total mood disturbance decreased, and negative affect remained unchanged. Affective responses and perceived exertion were not altered by training and were not different between groups.  Conclusion: Reducing sprint duration in the REHIT protocol from 20 s to 10 s attenuates improvements in VO2max, and does not result in more positive affective responses or lower perceived exertion.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherNRC Research Pressen_UK
dc.relationNalcakan G, Songsorn P, Fitzpatrick BL, Yüzbasioglu Y, Brick N, Metcalfe R & Vollaard N (2018) Decreasing sprint duration from 20 to 10 s during reduced-exertion high-intensity interval training (REHIT) attenuates the increase in maximal aerobic capacity but has no effect on affective and perceptual responses. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 43 (4), pp. 338-344. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2017-0597en_UK
dc.rightsThis is the accepted manuscript prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from the final official version. The version of record is available at: https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2017-0597en_UK
dc.subjectVO2maxen_UK
dc.subjectsprint interval trainingen_UK
dc.subjectSITen_UK
dc.subjectWingate sprinten_UK
dc.subjectaffecten_UK
dc.titleDecreasing sprint duration from 20 to 10 s during reduced-exertion high-intensity interval training (REHIT) attenuates the increase in maximal aerobic capacity but has no effect on affective and perceptual responsesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1139/apnm-2017-0597en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid29172029en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleApplied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolismen_UK
dc.citation.issn1715-5320en_UK
dc.citation.issn1715-5312en_UK
dc.citation.volume43en_UK
dc.citation.issue4en_UK
dc.citation.spage338en_UK
dc.citation.epage344en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailn.vollaard@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date24/11/2017en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEge Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Stirlingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUlster Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEge Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUlster Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSwansea Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSporten_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000428427800004en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85044658934en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid882740en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4576-8879en_UK
dc.date.accepted2017-11-15en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-11-15en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2017-11-29en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorNalcakan, Gulbin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSongsorn, Preeyaphorn|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFitzpatrick, Benjamin L|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorYüzbasioglu, Yasin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBrick, Noel|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMetcalfe, Richard|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorVollaard, Niels|0000-0002-4576-8879en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2017-11-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2017-11-29|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameNalcakan et al 2017 final.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1715-5312en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Nalcakan et al 2017 final.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version431.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.