Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/2617
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcAlpine, Amelia Nimmo-
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-13T16:23:57Z-
dc.date.available2010-12-13T16:23:57Z-
dc.date.issued1982-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/2617-
dc.description.abstractThe research began with the study of teachers' written comments on pupils' written work in an English teaching context. There were several reasons for the selection of the written comment as the subject of an investigation: first, the comment communicates the teacher's response to the pupil's work, and as such it offers a potential source of information to the pupil of relevance to his learning. In addition, written comments, as a form of individualised teaching on an informal day-to-day basis, seem likely to represent a significant portion of the total feedback received by any one pupil in relation to his individual performance. Third, to date, teachers' comments have not figured to any real extent as an area of research. Where they have, they have tended to be part of a wider study which did not involve the conceptualisation of comments as providing instructive information of value to the learner. For all of these reasons, an investigation of the character and possible contribution of the written comment to pupil learning seemed a potentially worthwhile area for research. Hence, the written comment is the focus of the first part of this study. Though the work began with the written comment, in time the questions emerging from the initial investigation suggested the value of extending the field to include a detailed study of the relationship between the classroom context and the written comment; and, more significantly as it turned out, of the oral comment as instructive feedback to the learner. Oral comments, therefore, are the subject of the second part. In the third section, the main questions arising from the oral comment data are examined. This meant in fact consideration of some teachers' images of the aspect of their teaching which most features the oral comment. In summary, the three parts of the study are: 1) an investigation of written comments; 2) an investigation of oral comments; 3) a report of teachers' accounts of one major aspect of their teaching.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Stirlingen
dc.subject.lcshEnglish language Study and teachingen
dc.subject.lcshEnglish language Topic and commenten
dc.subject.lcshTeacher-student relationshipsen
dc.subject.lcshGrading and marking (Students)en
dc.titleAn investigation of teachers' written and oral comments on pupils' learning performances in English teachingen
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Education-
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Education-
Appears in Collections:eTheses from Faculty of Social Sciences legacy departments



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.