Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Appears in Collections:||Communications, Media and Culture Newspaper/Magazine Articles|
|Title: ||Why PR agencies and their spin should be the subject of greater scrutiny|
|Author(s): ||Dinan, William|
|Issue Date: ||27-Oct-2017|
|Publisher: ||The Conversation Trust|
|Citation: ||Dinan W (2017) Why PR agencies and their spin should be the subject of greater scrutiny, The Conversation, 27.10.2017.|
|Abstract: ||First paragraph: It was one of the biggest and best-known British PR agencies around. So when Bell Pottingercame crashing downearlier this year, you could be forgiven for wondering why it hadn’t prepared a better crisis strategy to deal with the fall-out. You could also be forgiven for wondering why it was involved in work which ended up with it being widely accused of stirring up racial tension in South Africa. But Bell Pottinger was never shy of signing up controversial clients. It infamouslylobbied for former Chilean dictatorAugusto Pinochet when he wasarrested in Londonin 1998, held multiple contracts witharms of the Bahraini governmentand represented Asma al-Assad, the wife of the Syrian dictator.|
|Type: ||Newspaper/Magazine Article|
|Rights: ||The Conversation uses a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivatives licence. You can republish their articles for free, online or in print. Licence information is available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/|
|Affiliation: ||Communications, Media and Culture|
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.