Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26068
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCunningham, Maggieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFrance, Emma Fen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRing, Nicolaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorUny, Isabelleen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, Edward ASen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Rachel Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorJepson, Ruth Gen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMaxwell, Margareten_UK
dc.contributor.authorTurley, Ruth Len_UK
dc.contributor.authorNoyes, Janeen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-20T23:17:33Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-20T23:17:33Z-
dc.date.issued2019-02-28en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/26068-
dc.description.abstractBackground Meta-ethnography is a commonly used methodology for qualitative evidence synthesis. Research has identified that the quality of reporting of published meta-ethnographies is often poor and this has limited the utility of meta-ethnography findings to influence policy and practice. Objective(s) To develop guidance to improve the completeness and clarity of meta-ethnography reporting. Methods / Design The eMERGe study followed the recommended approach for developing health research reporting guidelines and used a systematic mixed methods approach. It comprised of: (1) a methodological systematic review of guidance in the conduct and reporting of meta-ethnography; (2) a review and audit of published meta-ethnographies, along with interviews with meta-ethnography end-users, to identify good practice principles; (3) A consensus workshop and two eDelphi studies to agree guidance content; (4) development of the guidance table and explanatory notes. Results Results from the methodological systematic review and the audit of published meta-ethnographies revealed that more guidance was required around the reporting of all phases of meta-ethnography conduct, and in particular, the synthesis phases 4-6 (relating studies, translating studies into one another and synthesising translations). Following the guidance development process, the eMERGe Reporting Guidance was produced, consisting of 19 items grouped into the 7 phases of meta-ethnography. Limitations The finalised Guidance has not yet been evaluated in practice, therefore it is not possible at this stage to comment on their utility. However, we look forward to evaluating their uptake and usability in the future. Conclusions The eMERGe Reporting Guidance has been developed following a rigorous process in line with guideline development recommendations. The guidance is intended to improve the clarity and completeness of reporting of meta-ethnographies, to facilitate use of their findings to inform the design and delivery of services and interventions in health, social care and other fields. The eMERGe project developed a range of training material to support use of the guidance, which is freely available at www.emergeproject.org. Future work Meta-ethnography is an evolving qualitative evidence synthesis methodology, and future research will refine the guidance to accommodate future methodological developments. We will also investigate the impact of the eMERGe reporting guidance with a view to updating the guidance. Study registration PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015024709 for Stage 1 systematic review Funding details The National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherNIHR Journals Libraryen_UK
dc.relationCunningham M, France EF, Ring N, Uny I, Duncan EA, Roberts RJ, Jepson RG, Maxwell M, Turley RL & Noyes J (2019) Developing a reporting guideline to improve meta-ethnography in health research: the eMERGe mixed-methods study. Health Services and Delivery Research, 7 (4), pp. 1-116. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr07040en_UK
dc.rightsPermission to reproduce material from this published report is covered by the UK government’s non-commercial licence for public sector information: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/non-commercial-government-licence/version/2/en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/non-commercial-government-licence/version/2/en_UK
dc.subjectMeta-ethnographyen_UK
dc.subjectReportingen_UK
dc.subjectGuidelineen_UK
dc.subjectQualitative Evidence Synthesisen_UK
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen_UK
dc.subjectPublication standardsen_UK
dc.subjectQualitative Researchen_UK
dc.subjectResearch Designen_UK
dc.titleDeveloping a reporting guideline to improve meta-ethnography in health research: the eMERGe mixed-methods studyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.3310/hsdr07040en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleHealth Services and Delivery Researchen_UK
dc.citation.issn2050-4357en_UK
dc.citation.issn2050-4349en_UK
dc.citation.volume7en_UK
dc.citation.issue4en_UK
dc.citation.spage1en_UK
dc.citation.epage116en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNational Institute for Health Researchen_UK
dc.citation.date12/02/2019en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEdinburgh Napier Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCardiff Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBangor Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid515265en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5850-9825en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0876-7030en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9548-5332en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3400-905Xen_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9446-445Xen_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-3318-9500en_UK
dc.date.accepted2017-10-31en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-10-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2017-11-01en_UK
dc.relation.funderprojectDeveloping meta-ethnography reporting guidelines and standards for research (eMERGE)en_UK
dc.relation.funderrefHS&DR/13/114/60en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorCunningham, Maggie|0000-0002-5850-9825en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFrance, Emma F|0000-0003-0876-7030en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRing, Nicola|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorUny, Isabelle|0000-0002-9548-5332en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDuncan, Edward AS|0000-0002-3400-905Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorRoberts, Rachel J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJepson, Ruth G|0000-0002-9446-445Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMaxwell, Margaret|0000-0003-3318-9500en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTurley, Ruth L|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorNoyes, Jane|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectHS&DR/13/114/60|National Institute for Health Research|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-02-12en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2019-02-12en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/non-commercial-government-licence/version/2/|2019-02-12|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename3028294.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2050-4357en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
3028294.pdfFulltext - Published Version2.52 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.