|Appears in Collections:
|Law and Philosophy Journal Articles
|Peer Review Status:
|Subnational Governance for the Low Carbon Energy Transition: Mapping the UK's "Energy Constitution"
law and geography
|Muinzer T & Ellis G (2017) Subnational Governance for the Low Carbon Energy Transition: Mapping the UK's "Energy Constitution". Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 35 (7), pp. 1176-1197. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654416687999
|The UK has a ‘national’ strategy to decarbonise its energy sector, yet the transfer of key responsibilities to its Devolved Administrations has meant that they control many of the powers that determine the rate and extent of the decarbonisation process. This reflects an asymmetrical distribution of legal responsibilities that has cast a complex range of powers ‘downward’ from the national sphere to subnational scales and which plays a crucial role in shaping the agency at different levels of the UK’s energy governance. This paper provides a detailed exploration of the UK’s ‘Energy Constitution’ as a means of examining the way in which the complex legal framework of devolution shapes the spatial organisation of the UK’s low carbon transition. Previous research on the low carbon transition has remained largely ‘lawless’ and as such has tended to overlook how the legal regimes governing energy both produce space and are shaped by its geographic context. The paper therefore develops a more nuanced understanding of the spatiality, territorialisation and scaling of UK energy governance to highlight a nexus of ambiguity and partial power allocation distributed across a plurality of overlapping ‘legal’ jurisdictions. This raises fundamental questions over how UK constitutional arrangements reify the territoriality of energy governance and structure the relationships between national and subnational multi-level decarbonisation processes.
|Muinzer T & Ellis G, Subnational Governance for the Low Carbon Energy Transition: Mapping the UK's "Energy Constitution", Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 35 (7), pp. 1176-1197. Copyright © The Authors 2017. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654416687999
|Fulltext - Accepted Version
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.