|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Talking with Vultures|
|Citation:||Ferrari F & Wright C (2017) Talking with Vultures, Mind, 126 (503), pp. 911-936. https://academic.oup.com/mind/article/3003290; https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzw066.|
|Abstract:||A Critical Study of Relativism and Monadic Truth, by Herman Cappelen and John Hawthorne. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2009. Pp. vii + 170.Argues that the contextualist account of the content of statements of personal taste offered by Cappelen and Hawthorne is not motivated by the shortcomings of the relativism to which they regard it as the only plausible alternative.|
|Rights:||This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Mind following peer review. The version of record Filippo Ferrari, Crispin Wright; Talking with Vultures, Mind, Volume 126, Issue 503, 1 July 2017, Pages 911–936 is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzw066|
|Critical Notice of Cappelen and Hawthorne final.pdf||Fulltext - Accepted Version||446.87 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.