|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Policy-driven evidence: Evaluating the UK government’s approach to immigration policy making|
|Citation:||Wallace T (2018) Policy-driven evidence: Evaluating the UK government’s approach to immigration policy making, Critical Social Policy, 38 (2), pp. 283-301.|
|Abstract:||This critique conducts a technical analysis of a UK Home Office report which was a key justification for passing the Immigration Act 2014. The law seeks to reduce non-EU immigration to the UK. The report is based on a 2012 report by the Migration Advisory Committee which used firmly established methods in the field of immigration studies. Despite this, it is concluded that the Home Office report not only excludes several important aspects of analysis, the entrepreneurialism of migrants and student immigration, but also has severe statistical problems. The report’s choice of operationalisations, lack of information regarding confidence intervals, and lack of sufficient model testing and repetition all combine to make it a weak piece of research and substantially undermine its suitability to inform policy. In the final analysis, this critique posits that the Home Office report reflects the Conservative government’s utilisation of 'policy driven evidence'.|
|Rights:||T Wallace, Policy-driven evidence: Evaluating the UK government’s approach to immigration policy making, Critical Social Policy (Vol 38, Issue 2) pp. 283-301. Copyright © The Author 2017. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications. The original publication is available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018317726251|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.