|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Journal Articles|
|Citation:||Millar A (2017) 'Berkeley's Puzzle', Analysis, 77 (1), pp. 232-242.|
|Abstract:||First paragraph: As represented by Campbell, Berkeley’s Puzzle is generated by two assumptions * ‘It is because of sensory experience that we have knowledge of our surroundings’ (1) * All that sensory experience can contribute to our knowledge is knowledge of sensory experience itself (1) The problem is deep since its roots are in a conception of how our concepts are, as Campbell puts it, grounded. On Berkeley s assumptions, corresponding to (1) and (2) we have, respectively, the following. 3. ‘Our understanding of concepts of the medium-sized world is grounded in our sensory experience’ (26) 4. ‘Sensory experience can provide only concepts of sensory experience itself’ (26) Given these assumptions there is an issue as to how we can so much as think about, never mind know about, a mind-independent world (3–4, 26).|
|Rights:||The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|anw070.pdf||91.53 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.