1. STORRE
  2. Faculty of Arts and Humanities
  3. Law and Philosophy
  4. Law and Philosophy Journal Articles
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/2565
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWheeler, Michaelen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-30T00:31:46Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-30T00:31:46Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/2565-
dc.description.abstractWhile remaining in broad agreement with the overall position developed and defended by Kiverstein, I identify and discuss what I take to be a number of problems with the details of the argument. These concern (a) the claim that a certain temporal structure to conscious experience is necessary for there to be a minimal sense of self, (b) the alleged ubiquitous presence in experience of a minimal sense of self, and (c) the claim that the distinction between the constitutive background conditions and the core realiser of a given experience is ultimately unsustainable.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherAssociation for the Scientific Study of Consciousnessen_UK
dc.relationWheeler M (2009) The Devils in the Details: a Response to Kiverstein's 'Minimal Sense of Self, Temporality and the Brain'. Psyche, 15 (1), pp. 75-81. http://www.theassc.org/vol_15_no_1_2009en_UK
dc.rightsAuthor retains copyrighten_UK
dc.subjectselfen_UK
dc.subjectconsciousnessen_UK
dc.subjectMoral educationen_UK
dc.subjectWittgenstein, Ludwig, 1889-1951en_UK
dc.subjectConsciousnessen_UK
dc.subjectPhilosophyen_UK
dc.titleThe Devils in the Details: a Response to Kiverstein's 'Minimal Sense of Self, Temporality and the Brain'en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePsycheen_UK
dc.citation.issn1687-7438en_UK
dc.citation.issn0033-2615en_UK
dc.citation.volume15en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage75en_UK
dc.citation.epage81en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.theassc.org/vol_15_no_1_2009en_UK
dc.author.emailm.w.wheeler@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPhilosophyen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-77956072849en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid822136en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-3638-1215en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2009-12-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2010-11-22en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorWheeler, Michael|0000-0003-3638-1215en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2010-11-22en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2010-11-22|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamewheeler_kiverstein_response_submitted.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount2en_UK
local.rioxx.source0033-2615en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The Devils in the Details.pdfFulltext - Published Version121.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
wheeler_kiverstein_response_submitted.pdfFulltext - Published Version44.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright

View License
Show simple item record


Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.