Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/25510
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMackay, Kathrynen_UK
dc.contributor.authorNotman, Maryen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-10T01:34:34Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-10T01:34:34Z-
dc.date.issued2017-12-31en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/25510-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The article outlines the duties and powers of the Adult Support and Protection (Scotland) Act 2007 and places them in the wider Scottish adult protection legislative framework. It considers the potential value of a standalone adult safeguarding statute.  Design: The authors draw upon their research and practice expertise to consider the merits of the Adult Support and Protection (Scotland) Act 2007. They take a case study approach to explore its implementation in one particular Scottish local authority; drawing on the qualitative and quantitative data contained in its annual reports.  Findings: Skilled, knowledgeable and well supported practitioners are key to effective screening, investigations and intervention. Protection orders are being used as intended for a very small number of cases.  Research limitations: The lack of national statistical reports mean that there is limited comparison between the local and national data.  Practical implications: Adult support and protection requires ongoing investment of time and leadership in councils and other local agencies to instigate and maintain good practice. Aspects that require further attention are self- neglect; capacity and consent; access to justice, and residents in care homes who pose potential risks to other residents and staff.  Social Implications: Adult Support and Protection (Scotland) Act 2007 has raised awareness of adults at risk of harm.  Originality: This article provides a critical appraisal of the implementation of Scottish adult safeguarding legislation over the last six years. It considers relative strengths and weaknesses in comparison to similar developments in England and Wales; and argues for comparative research to test these out.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherEmeralden_UK
dc.relationMackay K & Notman M (2017) Adult Support and Protection (Scotland) Act 2007: Reflections on Developing Practice and Present Day Challenges. Journal of Adult Protection, 19 (4), pp. 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAP-04-2017-0017en_UK
dc.rightsPublisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in The Journal of Adult Protection, (2017) Vol. 19 Issue: 4, pp.187-198 by Emerald. The original publication is available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAP-04-2017-0017. This article is deposited under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial International Licence 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0). Any reuse is allowed in accordance with the terms outlined by the licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). To reuse the AAM for commercial purposes, permission should be sought by contacting permissions@emeraldinsight.com.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectAdult support and protectionen_UK
dc.subjectScotlanden_UK
dc.subjectprotection ordersen_UK
dc.subjectinter-agency worken_UK
dc.subjectability to safeguarden_UK
dc.subjectcapacityen_UK
dc.subjectcase studyen_UK
dc.titleAdult Support and Protection (Scotland) Act 2007: Reflections on Developing Practice and Present Day Challengesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/JAP-04-2017-0017en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Adult Protectionen_UK
dc.citation.issn2042-8669en_UK
dc.citation.issn1466-8203en_UK
dc.citation.volume19en_UK
dc.citation.issue4en_UK
dc.citation.spage187en_UK
dc.citation.epage198en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailk.j.mackay@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date14/08/2017en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSocial Worken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPerth and Kinross Councilen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000407681700003en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85027461955en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid526526en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-2532-0022en_UK
dc.date.accepted2017-06-10en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-06-10en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2017-06-21en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMackay, Kathryn|0000-0002-2532-0022en_UK
local.rioxx.authorNotman, Mary|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2017-08-14en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2017-08-14en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/|2017-08-14|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameCasetsudy ASP JAP article June 2017.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1466-8203en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Casetsudy ASP JAP article June 2017.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version742.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.