Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/25256
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGuthrie, Bruceen_UK
dc.contributor.authorClark, Stella Aen_UK
dc.contributor.authorReynish, Emmaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcCowan, Colinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMorales, Daniel Ren_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-11T22:08:45Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-11T22:08:45Z-
dc.date.issued2013-07-17en_UK
dc.identifier.othere68976en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/25256-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Regulatory risk communications are an important method for disseminating drug safety information, but their impact varies. Two significant UK risk communications about antipsychotic use in older people with dementia were issued in 2004 and 2009. These varied considerably in their content and dissemination, allowing examination of their differential impact. Methods: Segmented regression time-series analysis 2001-2011 for people aged ≥ 65 years with dementia in 87 Scottish general practices, examining the impact of two pre-specified risk communications in 2004 and 2009 on antipsychotic and other psychotropic prescribing. Results: The percentage of people with dementia prescribed an antipsychotic was 15.9% in quarter 1 2001 and was rising by an estimated 0.6%/quarter before the 2004 risk communication. The 2004 risk communication was sent directly to all prescribers, and specifically recommended review of all patients prescribed relevant drugs. It was associated with an immediate absolute reduction in antipsychotic prescribing of 5.9% (95% CI -6.6 to -5.2) and a change to a stable level of prescribing subsequently. The 2009 risk communication was disseminated in a limited circulation bulletin, and only specifically recommended avoiding initiation if possible. There was no immediate associated impact, but it was associated with a significant decline in prescribing subsequently which appeared driven by a decline in initiation, with the percentage prescribed an antipsychotic falling from 18.4% in Q1 2009 to 13.5% in Q1 2011. There was no widespread substitution of antipsychotics with other psychotropic drugs. Conclusions: The two risk communications were associated with reductions in antipsychotic use, in ways which were compatible with marked differences in their content and dissemination. Further research is needed to ensure that the content and dissemination of regulatory risk communications is optimal, and to track their impact on intended and unintended outcomes. Although rates are falling, antipsychotic prescribing in dementia in Scotland remains unacceptably high. © 2013 Guthrie et al.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_UK
dc.relationGuthrie B, Clark SA, Reynish E, McCowan C & Morales DR (2013) Differential Impact of Two Risk Communications on Antipsychotic Prescribing to People with Dementia in Scotland: Segmented Regression Time Series Analysis 2001-2011. PLoS ONE, 8 (7), Art. No.: e68976. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068976en_UK
dc.rights© 2013 Guthrie et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.titleDifferential Impact of Two Risk Communications on Antipsychotic Prescribing to People with Dementia in Scotland: Segmented Regression Time Series Analysis 2001-2011en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0068976en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid23874832en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePLoS ONEen_UK
dc.citation.issn1932-6203en_UK
dc.citation.volume8en_UK
dc.citation.issue7en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailemma.reynish@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date17/07/2013en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Fifeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationDementia and Ageingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000322000600036en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84880424420en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid531562en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9076-3911en_UK
dc.date.accepted2013-06-11en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2013-06-11en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2017-04-11en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorGuthrie, Bruce|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorClark, Stella A|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorReynish, Emma|0000-0002-9076-3911en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcCowan, Colin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMorales, Daniel R|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2017-04-11en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2017-04-11|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamejournal.pone.0068976.PDFen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
journal.pone.0068976.PDFFulltext - Published Version707.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.