Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/2513
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMillar, Alan-
dc.contributor.authorHanson, Charlotte Emily-
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-25T10:25:16Z-
dc.date.available2010-10-25T10:25:16Z-
dc.date.issued2010-05-29-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/2513-
dc.description.abstractThis thesis is, in part, a defence of a broad-based approach to epistemology. We should be wary of taking too narrow a focus and thus neglecting important aspects of knowledge. If we are too focused on one methodology then we are likely to miss insights that can come about from a different perspective. With this in mind, I investigate two particular methodologies in detail: Kornblith’s naturalism and Craig’s ‘genealogical’ approach. Kornblith emphasises the importance of looking at knowledge in the context of the natural world, thus stressing the continuity between animal and human knowledge. Craig, on the other hand, focuses on a distinctly human aspect of knowledge: the importance of enquiry and the sharing of information. As such, the two theories of knowledge that are developed have different emphases. I argue that by bringing them together we can better understand what knowledge is. This leads us to the other main contribution of this thesis, which is a defence of the role of reflection in epistemology. This has often been neglected in contemporary epistemology, primarily because of the effectiveness of externalist theories of knowledge. The focus on externalism has lead to reflection being sidelined. I do not argue that reflection is necessary for knowledge, but rather want to bring back attention to the important role that it plays in human life. Reflectively accessible justification is necessary for our knowledge claims and therefore plays a vital role in enquiry. If we add reflectively accessible justification to knowledge then it is both more stable and more valuable. Even if it is not necessary for knowledge, reflection should not be neglected.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Stirlingen
dc.subject.lcshKnowledge, Theory ofen
dc.subject.lcshCritical thinkingen
dc.titleThe Epistemological Significance of Reflective Accessen
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Arts and Humanities-
dc.contributor.affiliationLaw and Philosophy-
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy eTheses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
C.E.Hanson Ph.D 2010.pdf508.63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.