|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Consensus Statement of the International Summit on Intellectual Disabilityand Dementia Related to Nomenclature|
Santos, Flavia H
|Citation:||Janicki M, McCallion P, Splaine M, Santos FH, Keller S & Watchman K (2017) Consensus Statement of the International Summit on Intellectual Disabilityand Dementia Related to Nomenclature. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 55 (5), pp. 338-346. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-55.5.338|
|Abstract:||A working group of the 2016 International Summit on Intellectual Disability and Dementia was charged to examine the terminology used to define and report on dementia in publications related to intellectual disability (ID). A review of related publications showed mixed uses of terms associated with dementia or causative diseases. As with dementia research in the non-ID population, language related to dementia in the ID field often lacks precision and could lead to a misunderstanding of the condition(s) under discussion; an increasingly crucial issue given the increased global attention dementia is receiving in that field. Most articles related to ID and dementia reporting clinical or medical research generally provide a structured definition of dementia or related terms; social care articles tend toward term use without definition. Toward terminology standardization within studies/reports on dementia and ID, the Summit recommended that a consistent approach is taken that ensures (a) growing familiarity with dementia-related diagnostic, condition-specific, and social care terms (as identified in the working group's report), (b) creating a guidance document on accurately defining and presenting information about individuals or groups referenced, and (c) that in reports on neuropathologies or cognitive decline or impairment, definitions are used and data include subjects' ages, sex, level of ID, residential situation, basis for dementia diagnosis, presence of Down syndrome (or other risk conditions), years from diagnosis, and if available, scores on objective measures of changing function.|
|Rights:||Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Accepted for publication in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities by AAIDD. The original publication will be available at: http://www.aaiddjournals.org/loi/mere|
|Nomenclature_Summit-revison-final.pdf||Fulltext - Accepted Version||545.17 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.