|Appears in Collections:||History and Politics eTheses|
|Title:||The Anglican prayer book controversy of 1927-28 and national religion|
|Supervisor(s):||Bebbington, David William|
Church of England
|Publisher:||University of Stirling|
|Abstract:||This is a study of religious national identity in Britain during the 1920s. The focus of the thesis is the Prayer Book controversy which engulfed the Church of England in 1927 and 1928 and climaxed with the House of Commons rejecting the Church’s proposals for an alternative liturgy on two occasions. The purpose of the revised book was to incorporate moderate Anglo-Catholicism into the life of the Church. It is asserted that the main factor behind the revision controversy, largely overlooked in previous studies, was a conflict of different models of national religion. While the dominant ‘Centre-High’ (sometimes referred to as ‘liberal Anglican’) faction in the Church, which included the English Catholic section of Anglo-Catholics, favoured a broadly Christian national religion and a tolerant, comprehensive established Church, many Protestants, in particular conservative Evangelicals, understood religious national identity to be emphatically Protestant under the terms of a Reformation settlement. The bishops’ revision proposals challenged the Protestant uniformity of the Church and so brought into question the constitutional relationship between Church and State. Thus the issue of national religion played a pivotal role in the revision controversy. Chapter one gives the background to the liturgical project in the Church, assessing the balance of power between the Anglican parties in the 1920s and explaining the purposes of revision. It is argued that the new Prayer Book reflected the reigning Centre-High orthodoxy of the House of Bishops and was moderately Anglo-Catholic in nature. This underlying agenda led many Evangelicals and advanced Anglo-Catholics to reject the new book. Chapters two and three describe the Evangelical and Anglo-Catholic responses respectively and argue that both parties were divided over revision, with large sections of both opposed to revision. Chapter four explains the attitude of the conservative Evangelical, Centre-High and ‘Western’ Catholic groupings towards the constitutional, cultural and moral dimensions of religious national identity. It argues that these understandings of national religion were a key cause of identity conflict within the Church and so determined the responses of each Church faction towards revision. Chapter five enlarges on the idea of Protestant national religion during the period by assessing the important role of the Free Churches and non-English mainline Churches in the crisis. It argues that the involvement of Protestants in these denominations was significant and that the ideologies of anti-Catholicism and national Protestantism motivated this. Finally, chapter six further emphasises the ‘national’ dimension of the revision controversy by explaining the attitude of the House of Commons to revision. It is asserted that the Commons’ debates on revision were in fact discussions on the role of national religion in 1920s Britain and that the rejections of the bishops’ proposals demonstrated the resilience of parliamentary Protestantism in British politics. Overall, the thesis concludes that, while Protestant national identity certainly weakened from the mid nineteenth century, this decline should not be exaggerated. Indeed the 1920s may have seen an upsurge in anti-Catholicism, as Protestants, in particular Evangelicals, reacted to the rise of Anglo-Catholicism in the Church and the post-war successes of Roman Catholicism. The idea of Protestant Britain remained a strong alternative to the conceptualisation of a broadly Christian Britain during 1920s.|
|Type:||Thesis or Dissertation|
|Affiliation:||School of Arts and Humanities|
History and Politics
|electronic thesis opening.pdf||title page, introduction, contents, declaration and abstract||28.2 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy|
|electronic thesis intro.pdf||Introduction||155.98 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy|
|electronic thesis ch1.pdf||Chapter One||149.05 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy|
|electronic thesis ch2.pdf||Chapter Two||172.86 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy|
|electronic thesis ch3.pdf||Chapter Three||182.11 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy|
|electronic thesis ch4.pdf||Chapter Four||150.03 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy|
|electronic thesis ch5.pdf||Chapter Five||139.04 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy|
|electronic thesis ch6.pdf||Chapter Six||194.83 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy|
|electronic thesis ch7.pdf||Chapter Seven||130.1 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy|
|Finalversionbiblio.pdf||Bibliography||71.98 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.