Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/24359
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYu, Hong-Lin-
dc.contributor.editorLo, C-F-
dc.contributor.editorLi, N-
dc.contributor.editorLin, T-Y-
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-19T01:11:53Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/24359-
dc.description.abstractThe ultimate aim of mediation is to reach a mutually beneficial settlement between the disputants. This would require good faith in cooperation from both disputants. This chapter launches a jurisprudential investigation into different types of mediation in Taiwan and England against Confucianism, legalism, naturalism and positivism. The paper concludes that voluntary mediation and compulsory mediation share a different basis and hence require different jurisprudential interpretations. Furthermore, an in-depth analysis on good faith in cooperation is also made to stress its importance in a successful mediation.en_UK
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relationYu H (2016) A Bad Compromise Is Better Than a Good Lawsuit: Mutual Influence Between the East and the West on Mediation. In: Lo C-F, Li N, Lin T-Y (ed.). Legal Thoughts between the East and the West in the Multilevel Legal Order: A Liber Amicorum in Honour of Professor Herbert Han-Pao Ma. Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 555-573.-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEconomics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific-
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.-
dc.subjectMediationen_UK
dc.subjectImplied compulsory mediationen_UK
dc.subjectJurisprudenceen_UK
dc.titleA Bad Compromise Is Better Than a Good Lawsuit: Mutual Influence Between the East and the West on Mediationen_UK
dc.typePart of book or chapter of booken_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31T00:00:00Z-
dc.rights.embargoreasonThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1995-1_32-
dc.citation.issn2199-8620-
dc.citation.spage555-
dc.citation.epage573-
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublished-
dc.type.statusBook Chapter: author post-print (pre-copy editing)-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-1995-1_32-
dc.author.emailh.l.yu@stir.ac.uk-
dc.citation.btitleLegal Thoughts between the East and the West in the Multilevel Legal Order: A Liber Amicorum in Honour of Professor Herbert Han-Pao Ma-
dc.citation.isbn978-981-10-1994-4-
dc.publisher.addressCham, Switzerland-
dc.contributor.affiliationLaw-
dc.rights.embargoterms2999-12-31-
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2999-12-31-
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Book Chapters and Sections

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
32_A Bad Compromise Is Better Than a Good Lawsuit Mutual Influence Between the East and the West on Mediation.pdf456.51 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.