Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/24168
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlly, Abdallah Ken_UK
dc.contributor.authorLovatt, Melanieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMeier, Petraen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBrennan, Alanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHolmes, Johnen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-20T05:31:44Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-20T05:31:44Z-
dc.date.issued2016-09en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/24168-
dc.description.abstractBackground and aims: The concept of national drinking culture is well-established in research and policy debate but rarely features in contemporary alcohol policy analysis. We aim to apply the alternative concept of social practices to quantitatively operationalise drinking culture. We discuss how a practice perspective addresses limitations in existing analytical approaches to health-related behaviour before demonstrating its empirical application by constructing a statistical typology of British drinking practices and examining sociodemographic variation in practice.  Design: Cross-sectional latent class analysis of drinking occasions derived from one-week drinking diaries collected for market research. Occasions are periods of drinking with no more than two hours between drinks.  Setting: Great Britain, 2009-2011.  Cases: 187,878 occasions nested within 60,215 nationally-representative adults (18+).  Measurements: Beverage type and quantity per occasion. Location, company and gender composition of company. Motivation and reason for occasion. Day, start-time and duration of occasion. Age, sex and social grade.  Findings: Eight drinking practices are derived. Three of the four most common practices are low risk, brief, relaxed, home-drinking (46.0\% of occasions). The most high risk practices had diverse characteristics and were observed across all sociodemographic groups. Two often-high risk practices identified are rarely acknowledged in policy debate: lengthy weekend domestic gatherings of friends and/or family (14.4\% of occasions) and lengthy, typically weekend occasions encompassing both on-trade and off-trade locations (10.4\% of occasions).  Conclusions: A practice-based perspective offers potential for a step-change in alcohol policy analysis by enabling evaluation of how much and why drinking cultures change in response to public health interventions.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_UK
dc.relationAlly AK, Lovatt M, Meier P, Brennan A & Holmes J (2016) Developing a social practice-based typology of British drinking culture in 2009-2011: Implications for alcohol policy analysis. Addiction, 111 (9), pp. 1568-1579. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13397en_UK
dc.rights© 2016 The Authors. Addiction published by JohnWiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectDrinking cultureen_UK
dc.subjectdrinking occasionen_UK
dc.subjectlatent class analysisen_UK
dc.subjectpracticeen_UK
dc.subjectpolicy analysisen_UK
dc.subjecttypologyen_UK
dc.titleDeveloping a social practice-based typology of British drinking culture in 2009-2011: Implications for alcohol policy analysisen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/add.13397en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid27095617en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleAddictionen_UK
dc.citation.issn1360-0443en_UK
dc.citation.issn0965-2140en_UK
dc.citation.volume111en_UK
dc.citation.issue9en_UK
dc.citation.spage1568en_UK
dc.citation.epage1579en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailmelanie.lovatt1@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date15/06/2016en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Sheffielden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSociology, Social Policy & Criminologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Sheffielden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Sheffielden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Sheffielden_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000382810400013en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84977519875en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid550660en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0185-6199en_UK
dc.date.accepted2016-03-17en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-03-17en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-09-06en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorAlly, Abdallah K|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLovatt, Melanie|0000-0002-0185-6199en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMeier, Petra|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBrennan, Alan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHolmes, John|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2016-09-06en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2016-09-06|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameAlly-etal-Addiction-2016.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0965-2140en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.