Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGarnett, Taraen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRoos, Elinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLittle, David Cen_UK
dc.description.abstractFirst paragraph: “Food systems need to become more efficient. We need to produce food in ways that use fewer resources and generate fewer negative environmental impacts. This drive towards efficiency is essential if we are to achieve more sustainable food systems.”  Such is the typical conclusion of numerous policy documents and industry statements, based on academic papers published in agricultural science and life cycle assessment journals.  It is a well-rehearsed observation that the food system today is undermining the environment upon which future food production depends. We know too that given current trends, our problems are set to grow, not just because our population is growing, meaning more mouths to feed, but also because our food demands are changing. As people on average become richer, they demand and can afford not just more food, but more of the foods that they like, notably those of animal origin. The rearing of animals for flesh, eggs and milk generates some 14.5% of total global GHG emissions, occupies 70% of agricultural land and is the main cause of the environmental problems such as biodiversity loss and water pollution.1,2 Moving from land to water, there are major concerns about the depletion of wild fish stocks and the negative effects of over fishing on aquatic ecosystems. Aquaculture production bridges and is linked to concerns in both the terrestrial and aquatic domains: it is a user of land based resources, but its production has been underpinned in recent years on wild fish stocks used as feed inputs.  While there is general agreement that action is needed to address the environmental problems caused by the food system, what such ‘action’ should be is the subject of substantial attention and debate within the policy, academic, business and NGO communities. One word that comes up time and again in discussions about the way forward is ‘efficiency.’en_UK
dc.publisherFood Climate Research Network (FCRN)en_UK
dc.relationGarnett T, Roos E & Little DC (2015) Lean, green, mean, obscene…? What is efficiency? And is it sustainable? Animal production and consumption reconsidered. Food Climate Research Network (FCRN).
dc.rightsThe publisher has granted permission for use of this work in this Repository. Published in Lean, green, mean, obscene…? What is efficiency? And is it sustainable? Animal production and consumption reconsidered, conducted for Food Climate Research Network:
dc.titleLean, green, mean, obscene…? What is efficiency? And is it sustainable? Animal production and consumption reconsidereden_UK
dc.typeResearch Reporten_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Oxforden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUppsala Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute of Aquacultureen_UK
rioxxterms.typeTechnical Reporten_UK
local.rioxx.authorGarnett, Tara|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRoos, Elin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLittle, David C|0000-0002-6095-3191en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|
local.rioxx.filenamefcrn_lmgo (1).pdfen_UK
Appears in Collections:Aquaculture Research Reports

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
fcrn_lmgo (1).pdfFulltext - Published Version966.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.