Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/2411
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGlenesk, Ann-
dc.contributor.authorShepherd, Ashley-
dc.contributor.authorNiven, Catherine-
dc.contributor.authorMackenzie, Joan-
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-14T10:57:34Z-
dc.date.issued2006-02-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/2411-
dc.description.abstractThe use of automated devices for blood spot sampling will ensure safety and benefits for babies and midwives (UKNSPC, 2005). The devices available differ in the technique of incision. The majority, which are less expensive utilise a guillotine incision and the other less common devices utilise an arched shaped incision. The results of a randomised controlled trial comparing two devices with the different techniques of incision suggest that devices with an arched shaped incision provide better quality blood samples, require fewer heel pricks to obtain a quality sample and the devices are cost neutral when all aspects of the blood spot sample are taken into account.en_UK
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherMark Allen Publishing-
dc.relationGlenesk A, Shepherd A, Niven C & Mackenzie J (2006) Blood spot testing: Comparing techniques and automated devices, British Journal of Midwifery, 14 (2), pp. 96-99.-
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author; you can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.-
dc.subject.lcshBlood Transfusion-
dc.subject.lcshBlood banks-
dc.titleBlood spot testing: Comparing techniques and automated devicesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31T00:00:00Z-
dc.rights.embargoreasonThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.-
dc.citation.jtitleBritish Journal of Midwifery-
dc.citation.issn0969-4900-
dc.citation.volume14-
dc.citation.issue2-
dc.citation.spage96-
dc.citation.epage99-
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublished-
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereed-
dc.type.statusPublisher version (final published refereed version)-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.intermid.co.uk/cgi-bin/go.pl/library/abstract.html?uid=20435-
dc.author.emailas10@stir.ac.uk-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Stirling-
dc.contributor.affiliationHS Research - Stirling-
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHP Research-
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute of Medical Genetics-
dc.rights.embargoterms2999-12-31-
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2999-12-31-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Shepherd - Blood Spot testing - comparing techniques and automated devices.pdf256.63 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.