Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23980
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWallace, Carolynen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPriestley, Marken_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T23:07:09Z-
dc.date.available2017-05-08T23:07:09Z-
dc.date.issued2017-03en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/23980-
dc.description.abstractScotland is one of several countries to have recently implemented a new national curriculum to highlight 21st century educational priorities. Teachers have been mandated to follow the new curriculum guidelines, known as Curriculum for Excellence (CfE), since the fall of 2010. The purpose of this study was to use a phenomenological lens to investigate how Scottish secondary science teachers are experiencing their work of curriculum development, including daily lesson design and more broadly, curriculum mapping within the context of reform (Remillard, 1999). We probed seven science teachers’ experiences to create both a composite profile of conscious thoughts about curriculum design and individual profiles that highlight interactions between the curriculum mandates, beliefs and agentic orientations. The study indicated that changes to curriculum development required accepting new cognitive commitments including: (a) analyzing the CfE document to discern the most significant principles underlying change; (b) reflecting on the ways that science teacher curriculum development is a problem-solving endeavor; (c) undertaking the complex processes of curriculum mapping, from primary school all the way through national qualification exams; and (d) recognizing that the epistemological frame for students’ science learning has changed and providing opportunities for students to create and apply knowledge. Two significant findings include the unpacking of these cognitive activities as part of a transformation toward a new epistemology of pedagogy, and the assertion that official curriculum documents can promote change, albeit with caveats concerning individual beliefs, agentic orientations and possibilities for agency within school contexts.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_UK
dc.relationWallace C & Priestley M (2017) Secondary Science Teachers as Curriculum Makers: Mapping and Designing Scotland's New Curriculum for Excellence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54 (3), pp. 324-349. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21346en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Wallace, C. S. and Priestley, M. R. (2017), Secondary science teachers as curriculum makers: Mapping and designing Scotland's new Curriculum for Excellence. J Res Sci Teach, 54: 324–349, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21346. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.en_UK
dc.subjectteacher changeen_UK
dc.subjectteacher beliefsen_UK
dc.subjectcurriculum developmenten_UK
dc.titleSecondary Science Teachers as Curriculum Makers: Mapping and Designing Scotland's New Curriculum for Excellenceen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2018-10-07en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Secondary Science Teachers as Curriculum Makers_final (1).pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/tea.21346en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Research in Science Teachingen_UK
dc.citation.issn1098-2736en_UK
dc.citation.issn0022-4308en_UK
dc.citation.volume54en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.spage324en_UK
dc.citation.epage349en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailm.r.priestley@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date06/10/2016en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationKennesaw State Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEducation Management and Support - LEGACYen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000394911600002en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84995609202en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid553667en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8276-7771en_UK
dc.date.accepted2016-07-29en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-07-29en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-08-08en_UK
dc.subject.tagCurriculum Changeen_UK
dc.subject.tagSchool Curriculumen_UK
dc.subject.tagCurriculum Makingen_UK
dc.subject.tagCurriculum Studiesen_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorWallace, Carolyn|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPriestley, Mark|0000-0001-8276-7771en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2018-10-07en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2018-10-06en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2018-10-07|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameSecondary Science Teachers as Curriculum Makers_final (1).pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0022-4308en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Secondary Science Teachers as Curriculum Makers_final (1).pdfFulltext - Accepted Version696.02 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.