Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23879
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHope, Simon-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-20T00:25:22Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/23879-
dc.description.abstractIt is commonly claimed, in the global justice literature, that global injustices are best characterised in terms of the violation or unfulfilment of human rights. I suggest that global justice theorists are overconfident on this point. For decolonising peoples, contemporary global injustice is likely to be characterised in terms drawn from local histories of injustice and the constellations of thick ethical concepts they contain. To make the point I describe how the Māori of New Zealand, who do not reject human rights, typically make no reference to human rights in political argument. I argue that the Māori are reasonable to consider human rights talk to be ‘one thought too many’, and the considerations that make this so typically apply in other postcolonial contexts of political activity.en_UK
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis-
dc.relationHope S (2016) Human Rights: Sometimes One Thought Too Many?, Jurisprudence, 7 (1), pp. 111-126.-
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Jurisprudence on 04 Apr 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/20403313.2016.1148429.-
dc.subjecthuman rightsen_UK
dc.subjectcolonisationen_UK
dc.subjectglobal justiceen_UK
dc.subjectMāorien_UK
dc.titleHuman Rights: Sometimes One Thought Too Many?en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2017-10-03T00:00:00Z-
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublisher requires embargo of 18 months after online publication.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2016.1148429-
dc.citation.jtitleJurisprudence-
dc.citation.issn2040-3313-
dc.citation.volume7-
dc.citation.issue1-
dc.citation.spage111-
dc.citation.epage126-
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublished-
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereed-
dc.type.statusPost-print (author final draft post-refereeing)-
dc.author.emailsimonjames.hope@stir.ac.uk-
dc.citation.date04/04/2016-
dc.contributor.affiliationPhilosophy-
dc.rights.embargoterms2017-10-04-
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2017-10-04-
dc.identifier.isi000373277600006-
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
HopeJurisprudence.pdf430.59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.