Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23876
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Whitehead, Lisa C | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Crowe, Marie T | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Carter, Janet D | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Maskill, Virginia R | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Carlyle, Dave | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Bugge, Carol | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Frampton, Chris M A | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-15T23:22:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-05-15T23:22:58Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-04 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23876 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Rationale, aims and objectives Self-management of type 2 diabetes through diet, exercise and for many medications, are vital in achieving and maintaining glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes. A number of interventions have been designed to improve self-management, but the outcomes of these are rarely explored from a qualitative angle and even fewer through a process evaluation. Method A process evaluation was conducted using a qualitative design with participants randomized to an intervention. Seventy-three people living with type 2 diabetes and hyperglycaemia for a minimum of 1 year, randomized to one of two interventions (n = 34 to an education intervention andn = 39 to an education and acceptance and commitment therapy intervention) completed stage one of the process evaluation, immediately following the intervention through written feedback guided by open-ended questions. A purposive sample of 27 participants completed semi-structured interviews at 3 and 6 months post intervention. Interview data were transcribed and data analysed using a thematic analysis. Results The majority of participants described an increase in knowledge around diabetes self-management and an increased sense of personal responsibility. Participants also described changes in self-management activities and reflected on the challenges in instigating and maintaining change to improve diabetes management. Conclusion The complexities of implementing change in daily life to improve glycaemic control indicate the need for ongoing support post intervention, which may increase and maintain the effectiveness of the intervention. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell | en_UK |
dc.relation | Whitehead LC, Crowe MT, Carter JD, Maskill VR, Carlyle D, Bugge C & Frampton CMA (2017) A nurse-led interdisciplinary approach to promote self-management of type 2 diabetes: A process evaluation of post intervention experiences. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 23 (2), pp. 264-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12594 | en_UK |
dc.rights | This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Whitehead, L. C., Crowe, M. T., Carter, J. D., Maskill, V. R., Carlyle, D., Bugge, C., and Frampton, C. M. A. (2017) A nurse-led interdisciplinary approach to promote self-management of type 2 diabetes: a process evaluation of post-intervention experiences. J Eval Clin Pract, 23: 264–271, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12594. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving. | en_UK |
dc.subject | evaluation | en_UK |
dc.subject | experience | en_UK |
dc.title | A nurse-led interdisciplinary approach to promote self-management of type 2 diabetes: A process evaluation of post intervention experiences | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2017-07-16 | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargoreason | [WHITEHEAD Final version Qualitative evaluation paper Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of [length of delay] months after formal publication. | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/jep.12594 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 27417302 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1365-2753 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1356-1294 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 23 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issue | 2 | en_UK |
dc.citation.spage | 264 | en_UK |
dc.citation.epage | 271 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | AM - Accepted Manuscript | en_UK |
dc.author.email | carol.bugge@stir.ac.uk | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 15/07/2016 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Edith Cowan University, Western Australia | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Otago | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Canterbury | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Otago | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Otago | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Health Sciences Post Qual - Stirling - LEGACY | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Otago | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000398570400004 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84992084538 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 555220 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-4071-0803 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-06-08 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2016-06-08 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2016-07-19 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | not required | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Whitehead, Lisa C| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Crowe, Marie T| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Carter, Janet D| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Maskill, Virginia R| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Carlyle, Dave| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Bugge, Carol|0000-0002-4071-0803 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Frampton, Chris M A| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Internal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2017-07-16 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2017-07-15 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2017-07-16| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | WHITEHEAD Final version Qualitative evaluation paper Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 1356-1294 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
WHITEHEAD Final version Qualitative evaluation paper Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 370.17 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.