Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23876
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWhitehead, Lisa Cen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCrowe, Marie Ten_UK
dc.contributor.authorCarter, Janet Den_UK
dc.contributor.authorMaskill, Virginia Ren_UK
dc.contributor.authorCarlyle, Daveen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBugge, Carolen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFrampton, Chris M Aen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-15T23:22:58Z-
dc.date.available2017-05-15T23:22:58Z-
dc.date.issued2017-04en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/23876-
dc.description.abstractRationale, aims and objectives  Self-management of type 2 diabetes through diet, exercise and for many medications, are vital in achieving and maintaining glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes. A number of interventions have been designed to improve self-management, but the outcomes of these are rarely explored from a qualitative angle and even fewer through a process evaluation.  Method  A process evaluation was conducted using a qualitative design with participants randomized to an intervention. Seventy-three people living with type 2 diabetes and hyperglycaemia for a minimum of 1 year, randomized to one of two interventions (n = 34 to an education intervention andn = 39 to an education and acceptance and commitment therapy intervention) completed stage one of the process evaluation, immediately following the intervention through written feedback guided by open-ended questions. A purposive sample of 27 participants completed semi-structured interviews at 3 and 6 months post intervention. Interview data were transcribed and data analysed using a thematic analysis.  Results  The majority of participants described an increase in knowledge around diabetes self-management and an increased sense of personal responsibility. Participants also described changes in self-management activities and reflected on the challenges in instigating and maintaining change to improve diabetes management.  Conclusion  The complexities of implementing change in daily life to improve glycaemic control indicate the need for ongoing support post intervention, which may increase and maintain the effectiveness of the intervention.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_UK
dc.relationWhitehead LC, Crowe MT, Carter JD, Maskill VR, Carlyle D, Bugge C & Frampton CMA (2017) A nurse-led interdisciplinary approach to promote self-management of type 2 diabetes: A process evaluation of post intervention experiences. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 23 (2), pp. 264-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12594en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Whitehead, L. C., Crowe, M. T., Carter, J. D., Maskill, V. R., Carlyle, D., Bugge, C., and Frampton, C. M. A. (2017) A nurse-led interdisciplinary approach to promote self-management of type 2 diabetes: a process evaluation of post-intervention experiences. J Eval Clin Pract, 23: 264–271, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12594. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.en_UK
dc.subjectevaluationen_UK
dc.subjectexperienceen_UK
dc.titleA nurse-led interdisciplinary approach to promote self-management of type 2 diabetes: A process evaluation of post intervention experiencesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2017-07-16en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[WHITEHEAD Final version Qualitative evaluation paper Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of [length of delay] months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jep.12594en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid27417302en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practiceen_UK
dc.citation.issn1365-2753en_UK
dc.citation.issn1356-1294en_UK
dc.citation.volume23en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage264en_UK
dc.citation.epage271en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailcarol.bugge@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date15/07/2016en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEdith Cowan University, Western Australiaen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Otagoen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Canterburyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Otagoen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Otagoen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Post Qual - Stirling - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Otagoen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000398570400004en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84992084538en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid555220en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4071-0803en_UK
dc.date.accepted2016-06-08en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-06-08en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-07-19en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorWhitehead, Lisa C|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCrowe, Marie T|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCarter, Janet D|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMaskill, Virginia R|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCarlyle, Dave|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBugge, Carol|0000-0002-4071-0803en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFrampton, Chris M A|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2017-07-16en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2017-07-15en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2017-07-16|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameWHITEHEAD Final version Qualitative evaluation paper Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1356-1294en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WHITEHEAD Final version Qualitative evaluation paper Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version370.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.