Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCaes, Lineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorVervoort, Tineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGoubert, Liesbeten_UK
dc.description.abstractFirst paragraph: Whether or not parents are allowed to be present during intensive, painful medical procedures is still a debated topic within the pediatric pain literature. Fueling this debate is the inconclusive evidence on the effect of parental presence during medical procedures: while some studies report positive associations between parental presence and parent and child anxiety, others report negative associations and some no association at all9 . Within clinical contexts, these inconsistencies have led to an absence of standard practice on parental presence during invasive medical procedures with each hospital implementing its own policy based on convenience and formerly implemented policies, which are possibly outdated. To date, little is known about parental needs and their desire to be present. Yet, preliminary evidence suggests that parents prefer to be given a choice whether or not to be present during medical procedures5 . While these needs should be appreciated, research delineating which parents and children are likely to benefit from parental presence versus absence is needed.en_UK
dc.publisherInternational Society for the Study of Painen_UK
dc.relationCaes L, Vervoort T & Goubert L (2015) Implementation matters: Parental presence during repeated painful procedures: a complicated matter. IASP SIG on Pain in Childhood Newsletter. 11.2015.en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher has not yet responded to our queries therefore this work cannot be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.titleImplementation matters: Parental presence during repeated painful procedures: a complicated matteren_UK
dc.typeNewspaper/Magazine Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Implementation matters_FINAL.pdf] The publisher has not yet responded to our queries. This work cannot be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.citation.issnNo ISSNen_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.publisher.addressWashington, DCen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGhent Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGhent Universityen_UK
local.rioxx.authorCaes, Line|0000-0001-7355-0706en_UK
local.rioxx.authorVervoort, Tine|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGoubert, Liesbet|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|
local.rioxx.filenameImplementation matters_FINAL.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.sourceNo ISSNen_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Newspaper/Magazine Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Implementation matters_FINAL.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version105.5 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.