Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcCreaddie, Mayen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWiggins, Sallyen_UK
dc.description.abstractBackground Humour is a complex phenomenon, incorporating cognitive, emotional, behavioural, physiological and social aspects. Research to date has concentrated on reviewing (rehearsed) humour and ‘healthy’ individuals via correlation studies using personality-trait based measurements, principally on psychology students in laboratory conditions. Nurses are key participants in modern healthcare interactions however, little is known about their (spontaneous) humour use. Aims A middle-range theory that accounted for humour use in CNS-patient interactions was the aim of the study. The study reviewed the antecedents of humour exploring the use of humour in relation to (motivational) humour theories. Participants and setting Twenty Clinical Nurse Specialist–patient interactions and their respective peer groups in a country of the United Kingdom. Method An evolved constructivist grounded theory approach investigated a complex and dynamic phenomenon in situated contexts. Naturally occurring interactions provided the basis of the data corpus with follow-up interviews, focus groups, observation and field notes. A constant comparative approach to data collection and analysis was applied until theoretical sufficiency incorporating an innovative interpretative and illustrative framework. This paper reports the grounded theory and is principally based upon 20 CNS–patient interactions and follow-up data. The negative case analysis and peer group interactions will be reported in separate publications. Findings The theory purports that patients’ use humour to reconcile a good patient persona. The core category of the good patient persona, two of its constituent elements (compliance, sycophancy), conditions under which it emerges and how this relates to the use of humour are outlined and discussed. In seeking to establish and maintain a meaningful and therapeutic interaction with the CNS, patients enact a good patient persona to varying degrees depending upon the situated context. The good patient persona needs to be maintained within the interaction and is therefore reconciled with potentially problematic or non-problematic humour use. Humour is therefore used to deferentially package concerns (potentially problematic humour) or affiliate (potentially non-problematic humour). This paper reviews the good patient persona (compliance, sycophancy), potentially problematic humour (self-disparaging, gallows) and briefly, non-problematic humour (incongruity). Conclusions The middle-range theory differentiates potentially problematic humour from non-problematic humour and notes that how humour is identified and addressed is central to whether patients concerns are resolved or not. The study provides a robust review of humour in healthcare interactions with important implications for practice. Further, this study develops and extends humour research and contributes to an evolved application of constructivist grounded theory.en_UK
dc.relationMcCreaddie M & Wiggins S (2009) Reconciling the good patient persona with problematic and non-problematic humour: a grounded theory. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46 (8), pp. 1079-1091.
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author; you can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.subjectgrounded theoryen_UK
dc.subjectWit and humor in medicineen_UK
dc.subjectNurse and patienten_UK
dc.subjectInterpersonal communicationen_UK
dc.titleReconciling the good patient persona with problematic and non-problematic humour: a grounded theoryen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[McCreaddie and Wiggins 2009.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleInternational Journal of Nursing Studiesen_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Research - Stirling - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Strathclydeen_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcCreaddie, May|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWiggins, Sally|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|
local.rioxx.filenameMcCreaddie and Wiggins 2009.pdfen_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
McCreaddie and Wiggins 2009.pdfFulltext - Published Version666.4 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-01-01    Request a copy

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.