Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23603
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHucklesby, Antheaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBeyens, Kristelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBoone, Mirandaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDunkel, Friederen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcIvor, Gillen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGraham, Hannahen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-12T02:07:25Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-12T02:07:25Z-
dc.date.issued2016-05en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/23603-
dc.description.abstractThe use of electronic monitoring (EM) has grown rapidly in the European Union and elsewhere and is likely to continue to do so but knowledge about its operation and its potential to provide a humane, credible and effective alternative to imprisonment is limited. The research on which this report is based was carried out in five jurisdictions in Europe (Belgium, England and Wales, Germany, the Netherlands and Scotland) which deploy EM in different ways and to varying extents facilitating comparative analysis. The research is the first empirical comparative study of electronic monitoring. Its aim was to compare the law, policy and practices in the five jurisdictions focussing particularly on EM’s capacity to act as an alternative to custody and to identify best practices to enhance its effectiveness and ensure that EM is used legally, creatively, ethically and humanely.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherUniversity of Leedsen_UK
dc.relationHucklesby A, Beyens K, Boone M, Dunkel F, McIvor G & Graham H (2016) Creativity and effectiveness in the use of electronic monitoring: a case study of five jurisdictions. European Commission. University of Leeds. http://28uzqb445tcn4c24864ahmel.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/files/2016/06/Synthesis-report-27-06-16.pdfen_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher has granted permission for use of this work in this Repository. Published as ‘Creativity and effectiveness in the use of electronic monitoring: a case study of five European jurisdictions’, conducted for the Use of Electronic Monitoring in EU Member States project: http://emeu.leeds.ac.uk/en_UK
dc.subjectCriminologyen_UK
dc.subjectcriminal justiceen_UK
dc.subjectelectronic monitoringen_UK
dc.subjecttaggingen_UK
dc.subjectcomparative researchen_UK
dc.subjectEuropeen_UK
dc.titleCreativity and effectiveness in the use of electronic monitoring: a case study of five jurisdictionsen_UK
dc.typeResearch Reporten_UK
dc.contributor.sponsorEuropean Commissionen_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedUnrefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commissionen_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://28uzqb445tcn4c24864ahmel.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/files/2016/06/Synthesis-report-27-06-16.pdfen_UK
dc.author.emailh.m.graham@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date30/06/2016en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Leedsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationVrije Universiteit Brusselen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUtrecht Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationErnst Moritz Arndt University of Greifswalden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSociology, Social Policy & Criminologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSociology, Social Policy & Criminologyen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid561767en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7147-2078en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0176-6350en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-06-30en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-06-29en_UK
dc.relation.funderprojectCreativity and Effectiveness in the Use of Electronic Monitoring as an Alternative to Imprisonment in EU Member Statesen_UK
dc.relation.funderrefJUST/2013/JPEN/AG/4510en_UK
dc.subject.tagCrime and Punishmenten_UK
dc.subject.tagPenal Policyen_UK
dc.subject.tagQualitative Research Methodsen_UK
dc.subject.tagPrisoners and Prisonsen_UK
dc.subject.tagCriminologyen_UK
dc.subject.tagElectronic monitoring and tagging technologyen_UK
dc.subject.tagCrime and Criminal Justiceen_UK
dc.subject.tagCriminal Justice Social Worken_UK
dc.subject.tagComparative Researchen_UK
rioxxterms.typeTechnical Reporten_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorHucklesby, Anthea|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBeyens, Kristel|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBoone, Miranda|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDunkel, Frieder|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcIvor, Gill|0000-0002-7147-2078en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGraham, Hannah|0000-0003-0176-6350en_UK
local.rioxx.projectJUST/2013/JPEN/AG/4510|European Commission (Horizon 2020)|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2016-07-06en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2016-07-06|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameElectronic Monitoring Comparative Synthesis Report.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Research Reports

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Electronic Monitoring Comparative Synthesis Report.pdfFulltext - Published Version525.53 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.