Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23343
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYu, Hong-Lin-
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Masood-
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-21T23:35:08Z-
dc.date.issued2016-05-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/23343-
dc.description.abstractFirst paragraph: Facing the possibility of being forced to pay over $50 billion dollars awarded in the Yukos arbitration, unsurprisingly, the Russian Federation filed a writ at the District Court in The Hague to set aside the awards. As expected, the controversial issues related to the award of the tribunal arc listed as the grounds for setting aside; the tribunal's lack of jurisdiction under arts 21(1), 26 and 45 of the Energy Charter Treaty, invalidity of the arbitration agreemcnt, the composition of the tribunal, arbitrability of tax issues, the mandate of the tribunal, and the breach of public policy. What is interesting for researchers watching the development of the Yukos case is the RF's argument over the possible inputs contributed to the awards by the arbitral tribunal's legal assistant. In essence, the RF argues that the arbitrators delegated substantial responsibilities to the tribunal's assistant and thus breached their mandate to perform their duties personally. As a consequence, the Russian Federation contends that the award should be set aside on the grounds of art 1065(1) (c) of the DCCP.en_UK
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherMoot Alumni Association-
dc.relationYu H & Ahmed M (2016) Keeping the Invisible Hand under Control? -Arbitrator's Mandate and Assisting Third Parties, Vindobona Journal of International Commercial Law and Arbitration, 19 (2), pp. 213-242.-
dc.rightsThe publisher has not yet responded to our queries therefore this work cannot be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.-
dc.titleKeeping the Invisible Hand under Control? -Arbitrator's Mandate and Assisting Third Partiesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31T00:00:00Z-
dc.rights.embargoreasonThe publisher has not yet responded to our queries. This work cannot be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.-
dc.citation.jtitleVindobona Journal of International Commercial Law and Arbitration-
dc.citation.issn1439-9741-
dc.citation.volume19-
dc.citation.issue2-
dc.citation.spage213-
dc.citation.epage242-
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublished-
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereed-
dc.type.statusPublisher version (final published refereed version)-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://maa.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=228&Itemid=153-
dc.author.emailh.l.yu@stir.ac.uk-
dc.contributor.affiliationLaw-
dc.contributor.affiliationBirmingham City University-
dc.rights.embargoterms2999-12-31-
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2999-12-31-
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Keeping the invisible hand under control.pdf867.07 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.