|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Teaching English to young learners: supporting the case for the bilingual native English speaker teacher|
|Keywords:||L1 and L2|
|Citation:||Copland F & Yonetsugi E (2016) Teaching English to young learners: supporting the case for the bilingual native English speaker teacher, Classroom Discourse, 7 (3), pp. 221-238.|
|Abstract:||The growing number of young children around the world learning English has resulted in an increase in research in the field. Many of the studies have investigated approaches to learning and teaching, with a particular emphasis on effective pedagogies (e.g. Harley, 1998; Shak and Gardner, 2008). Other studies have focused on the linguistic gains of children (e.g. Smojver, 2015) and on the complexities researching children entails (see Pinter 2011 for an excellent overview). However, despite calls in the literature, few studies, have examined in detail the effects on young children (five to ten years) of the teacher using different languages in the classroom, that is, L1 and L2 . The study reported here addresses this issue. Drawing on interactional data from two NEST (native English speaker teacher) classrooms, interviews with NESTs and homeroom teachers (HTs), and from the NESTs’ diaries, it examines the effects of languages used by two NESTs on young children’s learning. One NEST understands and can use the children’s L1; the other only understands and uses L2. We will show that in the context of the young learner classroom, teachers who know the children’s L1 have a greater repertoire of teaching skills and so can provide more language learning opportunities for language learning. This reality, we believe, supports the case for employing bilingual teachers wherever possible for the young learner classroom.|
|Rights:||This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Classroom Discourse on 30 Aug 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/19463014.2016.1192050.|
|postprint version classroom discourse article.pdf||456.33 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.