Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBlain, Neil-
dc.contributor.advisorMacdonald, Myra-
dc.contributor.authorDekavalla, Marina-
dc.identifier.citationDekavalla, M. (2009), “Scottish Press Coverage of General Elections After Devolution: the 2001 and 2005 Campaigns”, Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MECCSA Postgraduate Network, 2 (1).en
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines and compares newspaper coverage of the first two general elections after Scottish devolution, looking at both the Scottish and English/UK press. By considering the coverage of a major political event which affects both countries, it contributes to debates regarding the performance of the Scottish press within an arguably distinct Scottish public sphere as well as that of the press in England within a post-devolution context. The research is based on a content analysis of all the coverage of the 2001 and 2005 elections in seven Scottish and five English and UK daily morning newspapers, a critical discourse analysis of a sample of the coverage of the most mentioned issues in each campaign and a small set of interviews with Scottish political editors. As a framework for its analysis, this thesis focuses on theories of national identity and deliberative democracy in the media. It finds that the coverage of elections in the two countries has a similar issue agenda, however Scottish newspapers appear less interested in the UK aspect of the elections and include debates on Scottish affairs which are discussed in isolation, within an exclusively Scottish mediated space. These issues are constructed as particularly relevant to a Scottish readership through references to the nation, inclusive modes of address to the reader and the inclusion of exclusively Scottish sources, which contrast with the Scottish coverage of “UK” issues. This distinction between “Scottish” and “UK” topics emerges as the key differentiating factor in the discursive construction of election issues in the Scottish press, rather than that between devolved and reserved issues. Newspapers in England on the other hand, report on the two campaigns without taking into consideration the post-devolution political reality. These core questions are contextualized within the thesis by reference to relevant dimensions of Scottish culture and politics, and interpreted in the light of events since 2005.en
dc.publisherUniversity of Stirlingen
dc.subjectgeneral electionsen
dc.subjectScottish devolutionen
dc.subjectpublic sphereen
dc.subjectnational identityen
dc.subject.lcshElections Great Britainen
dc.subject.lcshDecentralization in government Great Britainen
dc.subject.lcshElections Great Britain Press coverageen
dc.subject.lcshPress and politicsen
dc.subject.lcshPolitical campaings Great Britain 21st century-
dc.titleGeneral Elections in the Post-devolution Period: Press Accounts of the 2001 and 2005 Campaigns in Scotland and England.en
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Arts and Humanities-
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Film and Media Studies-
Appears in Collections:eTheses from Faculty of Arts and Humanities legacy departments

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Phd Marina Dekavalla.pdf4.8 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.