Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFearns, Naomien_UK
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Joannaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCallaghan, Margareten_UK
dc.contributor.authorGraham, Karenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLoudon, Kirstyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHarbour, Robinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSantesso, Nancyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcFarlane, Emmaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorThornton, Judithen_UK
dc.contributor.authorTreweek, Shaunen_UK
dc.description.abstractBackground   Guideline producers are increasingly producing versions of guidelines for the public. The aim of this study was to explore what patients and the public understand about the purpose and production of clinical guidelines, and what they want from clinical guidelines to support their healthcare decisions.  Methods  Participants were purposively selected to represent a range of the likely users of patient versions of guidelines, including individuals with health conditions (diabetes and depression), general members of the public, health communication professionals and a group of young people. Participants were asked about their awareness and understanding of clinical guidelines and presented with scenario recommendations, or draft materials from patient guidelines to prompt discussion. Each discussion was facilitated by one or two researchers. All focus groups were recorded and transcribed prior to analysis. Data were analysed using framework analysis.  Results  We ran nine focus groups involving 62 individuals, supplemented by four interviews with people experiencing homelessness. Eight groups were held in Scotland, one in England. The four interviews were held in Scotland. The framework analysis yielded five themes: access and awareness; what patients want to know; properties of guidelines; presenting evidence; and format. Awareness of guidelines was low. Participants emphasised the need for information that enables them to choose between treatment options, including harms. They would like help with this from healthcare professionals, especially general practitioners. Participants differed in their support for the inclusion of numerical information and graphs.  Conclusions  Members of the public want information to help them choose between treatments, including information on harm, particularly to support shared decisions with health professionals. Presenting numerical information is a challenge and layered approaches that present information in stages may be helpful. Ignoring the themes identified in this study is likely to lead to materials that fail to support public and patient healthcare decisions.en_UK
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_UK
dc.relationFearns N, Kelly J, Callaghan M, Graham K, Loudon K, Harbour R, Santesso N, McFarlane E, Thornton J & Treweek S (2016) What do patients and the public know about clinical practice guidelines and what do they want from them? A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 16, Art. No.: 74.
dc.rights© Fearns et al. 2016 This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_UK
dc.subjectClinical practice guidelineen_UK
dc.subjectPatient guidelinesen_UK
dc.subjectPatient versionen_UK
dc.titleWhat do patients and the public know about clinical practice guidelines and what do they want from them? A qualitative studyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMC Health Services Researchen_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealthcare Improvement Scotlanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealthcare Improvement Scotlanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealthcare Improvement Scotlanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealthcare Improvement Scotlanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHS - Management and Support - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealthcare Improvement Scotlanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationMcMaster Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
local.rioxx.authorFearns, Naomi|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKelly, Joanna|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCallaghan, Margaret|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGraham, Karen|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLoudon, Kirsty|0000-0002-4449-6226en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHarbour, Robin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSantesso, Nancy|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcFarlane, Emma|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorThornton, Judith|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTreweek, Shaun|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fearns_etal_BMC_HSR_2016.pdfFulltext - Published Version666.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.