Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:History and Politics Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: From 'Doing History' to Thinking Historically: Historical Consciousness across History and International Relations
Author(s): Glencross, Andrew
Contact Email:
Keywords: Historical consciousness
IR theory
Issue Date: Dec-2015
Date Deposited: 2-Sep-2015
Citation: Glencross A (2015) From 'Doing History' to Thinking Historically: Historical Consciousness across History and International Relations. International Relations, 29 (4), pp. 413-433.
Abstract: Although most attempts to foster interdisciplinary dialogue are located outside mainstream IR, this article seeks to problematize how the two dominant paradigms of IR theory, realism and liberalism, think historically. The argument proceeds by examining how the disciplines consider what historical knowledge is useful for i.e. how they think historically or are historically conscious. This constitutes a shift away from the dominant dialogue over how to "do history" in IR. Historical consciousness is defined as the understanding of the temporality of historical experience or how past, present and future are thought to be connected. The analysis is set up to explore the extent to which both disciplines share a similar historical consciousness beyond merely treating history as instructive. To do so the article first examines the canon of European historiography to identify three genres of historical consciousness: history as teacher, history as narrative, history as representation. This survey of pre-positivist historiography serves to show the complexity of historical reflection within that discipline, something against which variance within IR theory can also be compared. Disciplinary comparison reveals that three genres of historical consciousness are present in liberalism and realism: lessons of history, revenge of history, and amongst progressive realists a speculative escape from history genre. Whereas the former spans both "isms" in IR, realism is shown to have a more complex understanding of temporality, thereby providing another conceptual starting point for distinguishing between these two "traditions. Moreover, these differences between genres of historical consciousness used within realism capture the split between realists that lies not in the origin of anarchy itself but in how realists think historically. What emerges, therefore, by comparing how disciplines think historically rather than "do" history, is the equally purposive or even political use of the historical knowledge they produce.
DOI Link: 10.1177/0047117815608233
Rights: Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in International Relations by SAGE. The original publication is forthcoming.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Historical_Consciousness_IR_FINAL.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version374.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.