Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/21999
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDuff, R A-
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-18T00:27:46Z-
dc.date.issued2013-01-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/21999-
dc.description.abstractThis paper offers a partial critique of one of the central lines of argument in Victor Tadros’ The Ends of Harm: his attempt to show that a system of deterrent punishment can avoid the objection that it treats those who are punished “merely as means” to our goals, by arguing that we may legitimately use someone as a means if in doing so we are simply forcing her to do what she anyway had an enforceable duty to do. I raise some questions about the idea of forcing someone to do what she has a duty to do; about what duties a wrongdoer incurs towards his victim, and how they may be enforced; and about whether we can move from such duties to a justification of criminal punishment as a deterrent.en_UK
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relationDuff RA (2013) Punishment and the Duties of Offenders, Law and Philosophy, 32 (1), pp. 109-127.-
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.-
dc.subjectTadrosen_UK
dc.subjectpunishmenten_UK
dc.subjectdeterrenceen_UK
dc.subjectoffenders' dutiesen_UK
dc.titlePunishment and the Duties of Offendersen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31T00:00:00Z-
dc.rights.embargoreasonThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10982-012-9150-5-
dc.citation.jtitleLaw and Philosophy-
dc.citation.issn0167-5249-
dc.citation.volume32-
dc.citation.issue1-
dc.citation.spage109-
dc.citation.epage127-
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublished-
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereed-
dc.type.statusPublisher version (final published refereed version)-
dc.author.emailr.a.duff@stir.ac.uk-
dc.contributor.affiliationPhilosophy-
dc.rights.embargoterms2999-12-31-
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2999-12-31-
dc.identifier.isi000313870700006-
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Duff_Law and Philosophy_2012.pdf192.21 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.