Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/21997
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, Clareen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAvenell, Alisonen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBoachie, Charlesen_UK
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Fionaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorArchibald, Daryllen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDouglas, Floraen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHoddinott, Paten_UK
dc.contributor.authorvan Teijlingen, Edwinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBoyers, Dwayneen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-10T02:48:46Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-10T02:48:46Z-
dc.date.issued2016-02en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/21997-
dc.description.abstractWe systematically reviewed the randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence for long-term (≥12 months) weight management interventions for obese men in contrast to women to help understand whether programmes should be designed differently for men. We searched 11 databases up to October 2014. Twenty-two RCTs reported data separately for men and women in weight loss or weight maintenance interventions. We found men were under-represented in RCTs of weight loss interventions open to both sexes. Men comprised 36% of participants (4771 from 13,305 participants). Despite this, men were 11% (95% CI 8-14%, p < 0.001) more likely to be trial completers compared to women. The trials did not report service user consultation and none were designed to investigate whether men and women responded differently to given interventions. Our meta-analysis of 13 trials showed no significant difference in weight loss between men and women, either for weight loss in kg (p = 0.90) or percentage weight loss (p = 0.78), although men tended to lose more weight with intensive low fat reducing diets, with or without meal replacements, and structured physical activity/exercise programmes than women. Orlistat was less beneficial for men for weight maintenance. Individual support and tailoring appeared more helpful for men than women. We found evidence that men and women respond differently to, and have different preferences for, varying types of weight management programme. We suggest that it is important to understand men's views on weight loss, as this is likely to also improve the uptake and effectiveness of programmes for men.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationRobertson C, Avenell A, Boachie C, Stewart F, Archibald D, Douglas F, Hoddinott P, van Teijlingen E & Boyers D (2016) Should weight loss and maintenance programmes be designed differently for men? A systematic review of long-term randomised controlled trials presenting data for men and women: The ROMEO Project. Obesity Research and Clinical Practice, 10 (1), pp. 70-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orcp.2015.04.005en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Accepted refereed manuscript of: Robertson C, Avenell A, Boachie C, Stewart F, Archibald D, Douglas F, Hoddinott P, van Teijlingen E & Boyers D (2016) Should weight loss and maintenance programmes be designed differently for men? A systematic review of long-term randomised controlled trials presenting data for men and women: The ROMEO Project, Obesity Research and Clinical Practice, 10 (1), pp. 70-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.orcp.2015.04.005 © 2016, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.titleShould weight loss and maintenance programmes be designed differently for men? A systematic review of long-term randomised controlled trials presenting data for men and women: The ROMEO Projecten_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2017-01-31en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Obes Research Clin Practice V2 for MUPPET.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.orcp.2015.04.005en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleObesity Research and Clinical Practiceen_UK
dc.citation.issn1871-403Xen_UK
dc.citation.volume10en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage70en_UK
dc.citation.epage84en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailp.m.hoddinott@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date30/04/2015en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Research - Stirling - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBournemouth Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000371256600009en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84946185309en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid596602en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4372-9681en_UK
dc.date.accepted2015-04-13en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-04-13en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2015-07-08en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorRobertson, Clare|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAvenell, Alison|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBoachie, Charles|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorStewart, Fiona|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorArchibald, Daryll|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDouglas, Flora|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHoddinott, Pat|0000-0002-4372-9681en_UK
local.rioxx.authorvan Teijlingen, Edwin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBoyers, Dwayne|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2017-01-31en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2017-01-30en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2017-01-31|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameObes Research Clin Practice V2 for MUPPET.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1871-403Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Obes Research Clin Practice V2 for MUPPET.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version326.72 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.