|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Are We Chained to Our Desks? Describing Desk-Based Sitting Using a Novel Measure of Occupational Sitting|
Brown, Helen E
Gilson, Nicholas D
Brown, Wendy J
|Citation:||Ryde G, Brown HE, Gilson ND & Brown WJ (2014) Are We Chained to Our Desks? Describing Desk-Based Sitting Using a Novel Measure of Occupational Sitting. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 11 (7), pp. 1318-1323. http://journals.humankinetics.com/jpah-in-press/jpah-in-press/are-we-chained-to-our-desks-describing-desk-based-sitting-using-a-novel-measure-of-occupational-sitting; https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2012-0480|
|Abstract:||BACKGROUND Prolonged occupational sitting is related to poor health outcomes. Detailed data on sitting time at desks are required to understand and effectively influence occupational sitting habits. METHODS Full time office employees were recruited (n=105; mean age 40.9±11.5 years; BMI 26.1±3.9, 65% women). Sitting at the desk and in other work contexts was measured using a sitting pad and ActivPAL for an entire working week. Employees used a diary to record work hours. Time spent at work, sitting at work and at the desk; number of sit to stand transitions at the desk; and number of bouts of continuous sitting at the desk <20 and >60 minutes, were calculated. RESULTS Average time spent at work was 8.7±0.8 hours/day with 67% spent sitting at the desk (5.8±1.2 hours/day), and 4% in other workplace settings. On average, employees got up from their desks three times/hour (29±13/day). Sitting for more than 60 consecutive minutes occurred infrequently (0.69±0.62 times/day), with most sit to stands (80%; 23±14) occurring before 20 minutes of continual sitting occured. CONCLUSION The findings provide highly detailed insights into desk-based sitting habits, highlighting large proportions of time spent sitting at desks, but with frequent interruptions.|
|Rights:||The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|Ryde et al_JPAH_2014.pdf||Fulltext - Published Version||181.07 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.