Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDinan, Williamen_UK
dc.description.abstractPurpose - The Scottish Parliament was founded on principles of openness and accessibility and signalled the potential for a new style of politics after devolution. In the aftermath of allegations of political sleaze early in the life of the new institution, the Standards Committee of the Scottish Parliament conducted an inquiry into the registration of lobbyists. This process attracted much comment and criticism from public affairs practitioners and the Scottish media. Based on original empirical research, numerous interviews and first‐hand observation, the purpose of this paper is to offer a response to some of these criticisms. Design/methodology/approach - The research reported here is based upon extended fieldwork and observation of the developing lobbying industry around the new Scottish Parliament, spanning the period from late 1998 until summer 2003. It involved some 73 interviews with various corporate and voluntary sector lobbyists, public servants and elected representatives. It also draws on participant observation at more than 70 official, public and private meetings for those involved in public affairs in Scotland. In addition, the paper monitored the popular and specialist media in Scotland for news and analyses of issues relating to lobbying at the new Parliament, undertook focus group research to test public opinion on the issue of registration, designed and administered an e‐mail survey of public servants in the USA and Canada charged with maintaining registers of lobbyists and conducted archival research at the Scottish Executive's library at Saughton House in Edinburgh. Findings - The paper suggests the efforts by parliamentarians to regulate their relations with lobbyists need to be grounded in principles that apply to all outside interests seeking to influence the democratic process. Originality/value - The paper challenges the assertions that lobbying is misunderstood by elected representatives and that the lobbying industry is entirely committed to increasing transparency.en_UK
dc.relationDinan W (2006) Learning Lessons? The Registration of Lobbyists at the Scottish Parliament: A reply to Coldwell. Journal of Communication Management, 10 (1), pp. 55-66.
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.subjectPublic Relationsen_UK
dc.titleLearning Lessons? The Registration of Lobbyists at the Scottish Parliament: A reply to Coldwellen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[13632540610646373.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Communication Managementen_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCommunications, Media and Cultureen_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
local.rioxx.authorDinan, William|0000-0002-4259-2150en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|
Appears in Collections:Communications, Media and Culture Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
13632540610646373.pdfFulltext - Published Version174.98 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-12-01    Request a copy

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.