Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/21432
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Watson, Jo | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Grenfell, Michael | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-03-28T23:24:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-03-28T23:24:28Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/21432 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The article reports on a study of methodological innovation involving occupational therapy (OT) students in higher education (HE). It is based on an original project which examined the experiences and outcomes of non-traditional entrants to pre-registration OT education. A feature of the original project was the application of the epistemological and methodological approach of the French social theorist Pierre Bourdieu, most noticeably in exploring the way that social back ground (habitus) interacted with the educational (field) context in terms of experience and educational outcome. Bourdieu used a ranged of techniques - both qualitative and quantitative - in collecting and analysing data. In particular, he used multiple correspondence analysis (MCA), a type of geometric data analysis recognized as a powerful tool enabling the representation of social space and the situating of individuals within it with respect to a number of variables. The article considers methodological principles in comparing ethnographic, traditional statistics and MCA. We show how the original data were reanalysed according to MCA. The article compares the original analyses and findings with those based on MCA in order to explore its strength over the previous approach and the potential it has to cast light on various issues in HE. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | Taylor and Francis | en_UK |
dc.relation | Watson J & Grenfell M (2016) Working in the methodological ‘outfield’: the case of Bourdieu and occupational therapy. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 39 (2), pp. 151-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2014.980802 | en_UK |
dc.rights | The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved | en_UK |
dc.subject | Bourdieu | en_UK |
dc.subject | methodology | en_UK |
dc.subject | multiple correspondence analysis | en_UK |
dc.subject | higher educational research | en_UK |
dc.subject | occupational therapy | en_UK |
dc.title | Working in the methodological ‘outfield’: the case of Bourdieu and occupational therapy | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2999-12-15 | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargoreason | [Watson and Grenfell_IJRME_2016.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work. | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/1743727X.2014.980802 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | International Journal of Research and Method in Education | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1743-7288 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1743-727X | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 39 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issue | 2 | en_UK |
dc.citation.spage | 151 | en_UK |
dc.citation.epage | 169 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | VoR - Version of Record | en_UK |
dc.author.email | michael.grenfell@stir.ac.uk | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 14/11/2014 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Southampton | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Education | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000374995800003 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84910150274 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 604625 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2014-08-13 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2014-08-13 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2015-02-02 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | not required | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Watson, Jo| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Grenfell, Michael| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Internal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2999-12-15 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved|| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | Watson and Grenfell_IJRME_2016.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 1743-727X | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Watson and Grenfell_IJRME_2016.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 978.11 kB | Adobe PDF | Under Embargo until 2999-12-15 Request a copy |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.