Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: The importance of specificity in occupation-based social classifications
Author(s): Lambert, Paul
Tan, Koon Leai Larry
Prandy, Ken
Gayle, Vernon
Bergman, Max
Contact Email:
Keywords: Jobs
Social differentiation
Issue Date: 2008
Date Deposited: 28-Oct-2014
Citation: Lambert P, Tan KLL, Prandy K, Gayle V & Bergman M (2008) The importance of specificity in occupation-based social classifications. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 28 (5/6), pp. 179-192.
Abstract: Purpose - This paper aims to present reasons why social classifications which use occupations should seek to adopt "specific" approaches which are tailored to the country, time period and gender of the subjects under study. Design/methodology/approach - The relative motivations for adopting a specific approach to social classifications are discussed and theoretical perspectives on specificity and empirical evidence on the contribution of specific approaches are reviewed. Also the practical costs of implementing specific social classifications are evaluated, and the authors' development of the "GEODE" data service (grid‐enabled occupational data environment), which seeks to assist this process, is discussed. Findings - Specific approaches make a non‐trivial difference to the conclusions drawn from analyses of occupation‐based social classifications. It is argued that the GEODE service has reduced the practical challenges of implementing specific measures. Research limitations/implications - There remain conceptual and pragmatic challenges in working with specific occupation‐based social classifications. Non‐specific ("universal") measures are adequate for many purposes. Practical implications - The paper argues that there are few excuses for ignoring specific occupation‐based social classifications. Originality/value - The paper demonstrates that recent technological developments have shifted the balance in the long‐standing debate between universal and specific approaches to occupation‐based social classifications.
DOI Link: 10.1108/01443330810881231
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Licence URL(s):

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IJSSP_28_179_192.pdfFulltext - Published Version234.97 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-12-01    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.