Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Problem definition and re-evaluating a policy: The real successes of a regeneration scheme
Author(s): Matthews, Peter
Contact Email:
Keywords: regeneration
local knowledge
interpretive policy analysis
Issue Date: Oct-2012
Date Deposited: 31-Jul-2014
Citation: Matthews P (2012) Problem definition and re-evaluating a policy: The real successes of a regeneration scheme. Critical Policy Studies, 6 (3), pp. 243-260.
Abstract: This article seeks to problematize notions of objective policy evaluation using the techniques of interpretive policy analysis, and use the findings to develop a new evaluation and new proposals for policy improvement. It presents evidence from ethnographic fieldwork on the same set of urban regeneration (or renewal) policies in two Scottish neighborhoods between 1989 and 2009. The analysis showed that the policy was variously understood as a failure or a success in four different ways: as a failure within the rationality of official evaluation; as a failure because of the stigma in wider society against deprived neighborhoods; as a failure in some ways by local community activists describing their lived experience through local knowledge; and as a success through local knowledge of the improvements to the physical environment. It demonstrates how policy problem definition and evaluation are closely intertwined and therefore for a policy to be judged a success requires a nuanced understanding of policy problems within their wider social context.
DOI Link: 10.1080/19460171.2012.699233
Rights: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published in Critical Policy Studies on 23/08/2012, available online:

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Problem definition and re-evaluating a policy- the real successes of a regeneration scheme.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version532.62 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.