Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/20480
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHarrow, Alisonen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDryden, Ruthen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcCowan, Colinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRadley, Andrewen_UK
dc.contributor.authorParsons, Marken_UK
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Alastairen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWells, Maryen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-15T08:55:05Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-15T08:55:05Z-
dc.date.issued2014-06-12en_UK
dc.identifier.othere005285en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/20480-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To explore women’s experiences of taking adjuvant endocrine therapy as a treatment for breast cancer and how their beliefs about the purpose of the medication, side effects experienced and interactions with health professionals might influence adherence. Design: Qualitative study using semistructured, one-to-one interviews. Setting: 2 hospitals from a single health board in Scotland. Participants: 30 women who had been prescribed tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole or letrozole) and had been taking this medication for 1–5 years. Results: Women clearly wished to take their adjuvant endocrine therapy medication as prescribed, believing that it offered them protection against breast cancer recurrence. However, some women missed tablets and did not recognise that this could reduce the efficacy of the treatment. Women did not perceive that healthcare professionals were routinely or systematically monitoring their adherence. Side effects were common and impacted greatly on the women’s quality of life but did not always cause women to stop taking their medication, or to seek advice about reducing the side effects they experienced. Few were offered the opportunity to discuss the impact of side effects or the potential options available. Conclusions: Although most women in this study took adjuvant endocrine therapy as prescribed, many endured a range of side effects, often without seeking help. Advice, support and monitoring for adherence are not routinely offered in conventional follow-up settings. Women deserve more opportunity to discuss the pros, cons and impact of long-term adjuvant endocrine therapy. New service models are needed to support adherence, enhance quality of life and ultimately improve survival. These should ideally be community based, in order to promote self-management in the longer term.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBMJen_UK
dc.relationHarrow A, Dryden R, McCowan C, Radley A, Parsons M, Thompson A & Wells M (2014) A hard pill to swallow: a qualitative study of women’s experiences of adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. BMJ Open, 4, Art. No.: e005285. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005285en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/en_UK
dc.titleA hard pill to swallow: a qualitative study of women’s experiences of adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast canceren_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005285en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMJ Openen_UK
dc.citation.issn2044-6055en_UK
dc.citation.volume4en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailmary.wells@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Taysideen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Taysideen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationMD Anderson Cancer Centeren_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000339717100093en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84903118223en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid626663en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5789-2773en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-06-12en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2014-06-17en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorHarrow, Alison|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDryden, Ruth|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcCowan, Colin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRadley, Andrew|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorParsons, Mark|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorThompson, Alastair|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWells, Mary|0000-0001-5789-2773en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2014-06-17en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/|2014-06-17|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameHarrow2014BMJopenpublishedadherencestudy.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Harrow2014BMJopenpublishedadherencestudy.pdfFulltext - Published Version859.66 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.